Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 28;20:36. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-1918-4

Table 1.

Frequency of responses to questions in our questionnaire separated by primary type of unit in which responders work

Question Responders
All responders Working predominately in a NICU - Level 3 Working in paediatrics, Level 2 unit, or interest in epilepsy Working predominately in paediatric neurology / neurodisability unit All Consultant Responders
Do you treat clinical seizures (i.e. where there is no available aEEG / EEG data to confirm abnormal movements are seizures? Yes 65/100 (65.0%) 18/33 (54.6%) 38/45 (84.4%) 9/22 (40.9%) 54/81 (66.7%)
No 9/100 (9.0%) 4/33 (12.1%) 3/45 (6.7%) 2/22 (9.1%) 5/81 (6.1%)
Sometimes 26/100 (26.0%) 11/33 (33.3%) 4/45 (8.9%) 11/22 (50.0%) 22/81 (27.2%)
Do you treat electrical seizures (i.e. diagnosed on aEEG/EEG) which do not have any clinical features to see? Yes 34/100 (34.0%) 14/33 (42.4%) 15/45 (33.3%) 5/22 (22.7%) 27/81 (33.3%)
No 17/100 (17.0%) 1/33 (3.0%) 15/45 (33.3%) 1/22 (4.5%) 11/81 (13.6%)
Sometimes 49/100 (49.0%) 18/33 (54.6%) 15/45 (33.3%) 16/22 (72.7%) 43/81 (53.1%)
Do you think electrical seizures are: As important as clinical seizures 53/100 (53.0%) 17/33 (51.5%) 25/45 (55.6%) 11/22 (50.0%) 43/81 (53.1%)
More important than clinical seizures 9/100 (9.0%) 2/33 (6.1%) 4/45 (8.9%) 3/22 (13.6%) 6/81 (7.4%)
Less important than clinical seizures 16/100 (16.0%) 6/33 (18.2%) 5/45 (11.1%) 5/22 (22.8%) 14/81 (17.3%)
I don’t know 22/100 (22.0%) 8/33 (24.2%) 11/45 (24.4%) 3/22 (13.6%) 18/81 (22.2%)
Do you think seizures themselves cause harm to the brain/ development (i.e. not related to apnoea/hypoxia and independent of the underlying cause)? Yes 62/100 (62.0%) 24/33 (72.7%) 27/45 (60.0%) 11/22 (50.0%) 53/81 (65.4%)
No 15/100 (15.0%) 3/33 (9.1%) 9/45 (20.0%) 3/22 (13.6%) 12/81 (14.8%)
I don’t know 23/100 (23.0%) 6/33 (18.2%) 9/45 (20.0%) 8/22 (36.4%) 16/81 (19.8%)
Do you routinely use cerebral function monitoring (aEEG) for monitoring neonates at high risk of seizures or those having recurrent seizures? We use it in all neonates at risk of seizures 44/94 (46.8%) 20/31 (64.5%) 12/43 (28.0%) 12/20 (60.0%) 39/78 (50.0%)
We use it only in those with HIE 10/94 (10.6%) 5/31 (16.1%) 5/43 (11.6%) 0/20 (0.0%) 9/78 (11.5%)
We use it in selected cases, HIE and non-HIE 20/94 (21.3%) 5/31 (16.1%) 8/43 (18.6%) 7/20 (35.0%) 14/78 (18.0%)
We don’t use it at all 19/94 (20.2%) 1/31 (3.3%) 17/43 (39.5%) 1/20 (5.0%) 16/78 (20.5%)
I don’t know 1/94 (1.1%) 0/31 (0%) 1/43 (2.3%) 0/20 (0%) 0/78 (0%)
With reference to Phenobarbital, do you think it is … Very effective 29/94 (30.9%) 6/31 (19.4%) 16/43 (37.2%) 7/20 (35.0%) 25/78 (32.1%)
Stops some seizures but not all 65/94 (69.1%) 25/31 (80.6%) 27/43 (62.8%) 13/20 (65.0%) 53/78 (67.9%)
Not at all effective 0/94 (0%) 0/31 (0%) 0/43 (0%) 0/20 (0%) 0/78 (0%)
Have you tried Levetiracetam for treatment of neonatal seizures? Yes 65/94 (69.1%) 26/31 (83.9%) 19/43 (44.2%) 20/20 (100%) 59/78 (75.6%)
No 29/94 (30.9%) 5/31 (16.1%) 24/43 (55.8%) 0/20 (0%) 19/78 (24.4%)
Do you think Levetiracetam (Keppra) is … Very effective 21/65 (32.3%) 8/26 (30.8%) 9/19 (47.4%) 4/20 (20.0%) 19/59 (32.2%)
Stops some seizures but not all 44/65 (67.7%) 18/26 (69.2%) 10/19 (52.6%) 16/20 (80.0%) 40/59 (67.8%)
Not at all effective 0/65 (0%) 0/26 (0%) 0/19 (0%) 0/20 (0%) 0/59 (0%)
Compared to Phenobarbital, do you think Levetiracetam is Better than phenobarbital 14/65 (21.5%) 7/26 (26.9%) 3/19 (15.8%) 4/20 (20.0%) 13/59 (22.0%)
As good as phenobarbital 17/65 (26.2%) 3/26 (11.5%) 9/19 (47.4%) 5/20 (25.0%) 14/59 (23.7%)
Less good than phenobarbital 6/65 (9.2%) 1/26 (3.9%) 1/19 (5.2%) 4/20 (20.0%) 6/59 (10.2%)
I don’t know 28/65 (43.1%) 15/26 (57.7%) 6/19 (31.6%) 7/20 (35.0%) 26/59 (44.1%)