Table 4.
Growth performance of weanling pigs fed the positive control diet (PC), the negative control diet (NC), or diets containing different doses of C. butyricum (CB)1,2
| Treatment | P-value | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Item | PC | NC | NC+ 1,250 cfu | NC + 2,500 cfu | NC + 3,500 cfu | SEM | Linear | Quad3 | NC vs. CB | PC vs. CB | PC vs. NC |
| Days 0 to 14 (phase 1) | |||||||||||
| Initial weight, kg | 6.44 | 6.42 | 6.43 | 6.41 | 6.44 | 0.24 | 0.978 | 0.972 | 0.986 | 0.977 | 0.969 |
| ADG, g | 134 | 105 | 120 | 127 | 112 | 10.59 | 0.479 | 0.137 | 0.197 | 0.217 | 0.045 |
| ADFI, g | 217 | 193 | 217 | 207 | 204 | 23.37 | 0.648 | 0.210 | 0.219 | 0.593 | 0.163 |
| G:F | 0.619 | 0.538 | 0.548 | 0.614 | 0.551 | 0.06 | 0.404 | 0.306 | 0.360 | 0.221 | 0.086 |
| Final weight, kg | 8.21 | 7.89 | 8.10 | 8.19 | 8.00 | 0.31 | 0.721 | 0.500 | 0.530 | 0.739 | 0.434 |
| Days 14 to 35 (phase 2) | |||||||||||
| ADG, g | 595 | 554 | 608 | 570 | 562 | 19.86 | 0.904 | 0.027 | 0.122 | 0.375 | 0.049 |
| ADFI, g | 910 | 845 | 901 | 865 | 901 | 27.38 | 0.196 | 0.609 | 0.093 | 0.422 | 0.045 |
| G:F | 0.655 | 0.656 | 0.674 | 0.660 | 0.627 | 0.01 | 0.080 | 0.031 | 0.865 | 0.906 | 0.966 |
| Final weight, kg | 20.69 | 19.50 | 20.85 | 20.14 | 19.79 | 0.44 | 0.886 | 0.051 | 0.145 | 0.406 | 0.064 |
| Days 0 to 35 (overall phase) | |||||||||||
| ADG, g | 408 | 374 | 412 | 393 | 382 | 10.92 | 0.849 | 0.006 | 0.040 | 0.243 | 0.010 |
| ADFI, g | 633 | 584 | 628 | 602 | 622 | 15.67 | 0.213 | 0.421 | 0.073 | 0.403 | 0.033 |
| G:F | 0.646 | 0.641 | 0.657 | 0.653 | 0.617 | 0.01 | 0.133 | 0.013 | 0.910 | 0.780 | 0.749 |
1Each least squares mean represents 11 observations.
2 C. butyricum was added to provide 1,250 × 108, 2,500 × 108, or 3,500 × 108 cfu/kg of complete diet.
3Quad, quadratic effect.