Skip to main content
. 2007 Apr 18;2007(2):CD004059. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004059.pub3

Klein 1993.

Methods Randomized allocation by random numbers table. Double blind (participants and observers).
Participants Sansum Medical Clinic, Santa Barbara, California 
 80 participants with chronic non‐specific low back pain, duration over 6 months. 
 Experimental: mean age (SD) 44.6 (8.6), 21 males, years of pain (SD) 11.2 (7.9). 
 Control group: mean age (SD) 43.5 (9.2), 20 males, years of pain (SD) 11.8 (10.1).
Interventions Experimental group (E) (n = 39, due to withdrawal of 1 participant due to development of acute radiculopathy following an athletic injury): 
 Weekly injections of lumbopelvic ligaments with glucose (12.5%) glycerine (12.5%) phenol (1.25%) 0.25% lignocaine, up to 30 ml in total. 6 injection treatments. 
 Control group (C) (n = 40): 
 Weekly injections of lumbopelvic ligaments with 0.25% lignocaine, up to 30 ml in total. 6 injection treatments. 
 Both groups: 
 Initial injection of lumbopelvic ligaments with 0.5% lignocaine followed by forceful manipulation and injection of gluteal tender points (if present) with triamcinolone/lignocaine; 200 flexion/extension exercises daily and 1 mile walk 5 times per week
Outcomes Mean (SD) of outcomes at baseline and at 6 months after intervention 
 1. VAS pain: (E) 4.88 (1.30), 2.29 (1.67); (C) 4.56 (1.12), 2.85 (1.88) 
 2. Roland disability questionnaire added with 9 questions from Waddell's chronic disability index: (E) 9.36 (3.56), 4.04 (3.71) (C) 8.25 (3.26), 4.38 (4.05).
Notes Methodological quality score 11/11
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Low risk Randomized allocation by random numbers table.
Allocation concealment? Low risk A ‐ Adequate
Blinding? 
 All outcomes ‐ patients? Low risk  
Blinding? 
 All outcomes ‐ providers? Low risk  
Blinding? 
 All outcomes ‐ outcome assessors? Low risk  
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes ‐ drop‐outs? Low risk  
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes ‐ ITT analysis? Low risk  
Similarity of baseline characteristics? Low risk  
Co‐interventions avoided or similar? Low risk  
Compliance acceptable? Low risk  
Timing outcome assessments similar? Low risk