Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 28;10:1365. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58403-x

Table 1.

Comparison of the performance of Au@Ni/C in this study and Au or Ni-based electrodes reported recently for glucose detection.

Catalysts Applied potential (V) Sensitivity (μA cm−2 mM−1) Linear range (mM) Detection limit (μM) ref.
Au@Ni/C 0.10a 23.17 0.5‒10.0 15.7 This study
Au/ITO 0.15a 23.0 0‒11.0 5.0 15
Au/GtO 0.16a 98.7 0‒25.0 99.0 14
Au NPs 0.24b 87.5 0.1‒25.0 50.0 47
Au nanotube array 0.25a 0.0013 1.0‒42.5 10.0 25
Au/MWCNT/Nafion 0.30b 0.4 0.05‒20 20.0 48
Macroporous Au 0.40b 39.53 1‒20 25.0 37
Au/rGtO 0.16a 39.8 0‒10 63.0 14
Au-rGO-SWCNT 0.15‒0.25b 0‒80 0.0022 16
Au/NiAu MNAs 0.40a 483 0.005‒31 1.0 18
Au@Cu2O 0.65a 715 0.05‒2.0 18.0 21
Au-Pt hybrids 0.40a 39.53 1‒20 25.0 37
Ni-Au MCL 0.55b 506 0.02‒10 14.9 49
Au-Ni bimetal 0.40a 1.30 0.01‒20 0.29 50
Au@Pt/Au 0.35b 8.28 0.01‒10 0.4457 51

aThe reference electrode is a saturated calomel electrode. bThe reference electrode is an Ag/AgCl electrode.