Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 28;4:4. doi: 10.1186/s41747-019-0135-0

Table 3.

Comparison of tiger vertebral microarchitectural parameters obtained with different CT scanners, matrix numbers, and slice thicknesses ex vivo

Group
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7
CT scanner CRCT UHRCT UHRCT UHRCT UHRCT UHRCT Micro-CT
Matrix number 512 512 512 1024 1024 2048 2048
Slice thickness (mm) 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.06
vBMD (mg/cm3) 20.8 ± 8.6 37.7 ± 10.9 42.9 ± 12.5 46.2 ± 12.2 51.4 ± 12.4 63.5 ± 13.7 199.6 ± 25.5
BV/TV (%) 13.8 ± 6.2 20.2 ± 5.7 23.1 ± 5.7 24.5 ± 5.7 26.5 ± 5.2 29.5 ± 4.9 79.2 ± 6.7
Tb.Th (μm) 312.8 ± 58.8 208.1 ± 28.8 217.1 ± 21.7 196.3 ± 27.2 204.6 ± 22.3 200 ± 19.9 420 ± 56.6
Tb.N (l/mm) 0.47 ± 0.26 0.98 ± 0.27 1.06 ± 0.22 1.26 ± 0.3 1.3 ± 0.22 1.48 ± 0.23 1.91 ± 0.24
Tb.Sp (μm) 2671 ± 2040 892 ± 380 768 ± 253 637 ± 210 586 ± 146 489 ± 109 111 ± 40
ConnD (l/mm3) 0.02 ± 0.01 0.16 ± 0.07 0.31 ± 0.14 0.29 ± 0.14 0.52 ± 0.17 0.74 ± 0.17 1.36 ± 0.46

Data are means ± standard deviations

T1–T7 Tiger vertebra groups 1–7, CRCT Conventional resolution computed tomography, UHRCT Ultra-high-resolution computed tomography, vBMD Volumetric bone mineral density, BV/TV Trabecular bone volume fraction, Tb.Th Trabecular thickness, Tb.N Trabecular number, Tb.Sp Trabecular separation, ConnD Connectivity density