Table 5.
Pearson correlation between bark, stem and leaf traits among 31 tree species from Brazilian Cerrado.
| RBTtotal | RBTouter | RBTinner | RBT30 | D bark | SD | D wood | BWC | WWC | LWC | %WinB | Ψstem-md | K stem | BGR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bark traits | ||||||||||||||
| RBTouter | 0.50** | |||||||||||||
| RBTinner | 0.90** | 0.10ns | ||||||||||||
| RBT30 | 0.44** | 0.25ns | 0.38* | |||||||||||
| D bark | -0.56** | -0.18ns | -0.54** | -0.43** | ||||||||||
| Wood traits | ||||||||||||||
| SD | 0.67** | 0.42* | 0.55** | 0.27ns | -0.68** | |||||||||
| D wood | -0.38* | 0.10ns | -0.45* | -0.35* | 0.71** | -0.45** | ||||||||
| Water relations | ||||||||||||||
| BWC | 0.19ns | -0.28ns | 0.35* | 0.22ns | -0.79** | 0.35* | -0.66** | |||||||
| WWC | 0.37* | -0.03ns | 0.43* | 0.39* | -0.70** | 0.44** | -0.94** | 0.64** | ||||||
| LWC | 0.10ns | -0.11ns | 0.13ns | 0.16ns | -0.65** | 0.15ns | -0.69** | 0.67** | 0.67** | |||||
| %WinB | 0.64** | 0.25ns | 0.63** | 0.08ns | -0.37* | 0.54** | -0.02ns | 0.15ns | -0.02ns | -0.13ns | ||||
| Ψstem-md | 0.49** | 0.18ns | 0.49** | 0.39* | -0.54** | 0.48** | -0.52** | 0.42* | 0.56** | 0.28ns | 0.23ns | |||
| K stem | 0.05ns | -0.29ns | 0.19ns | 0.18ns | -0.53** | 0.14ns | -0.71** | 0.64** | 0.69** | 0.50** | 0.10ns | -0.44** | ||
| Growth | ||||||||||||||
| BGR | 0.20ns | 0.13ns | 0.16ns | 0.14ns | -0.39* | 0.44** | -0.25ns | 0.38* | 0.25ns | 0.11ns | 0.26ns | -0.23ns | 0.03ns | |
| A mass | 0.37* | 0.22ns | 0.35* | 0.36* | -0.45** | 0.50** | -0.50** | 0.23ns | 0.55** | 0.04ns | 0.09ns | -0.41* | 0.58** | 0.12ns |