Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 22;10:3054. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03054

TABLE 4.

Results of estimated LMMs for the variable letter recognition to T1 vs. T3.

Estimate (SE) df t-Score p-Value CI 95%
Lower Upper
Reference: pencil group
Intercept 7.05 (0.31) 264.44 23.00 < 0.001 6.45 7.65
T3 (Reference = T1) 1.53 (0.39) 137.58 3.90 < 0.001 0.76 2.31
Stylus group 0.07 (0.43) 263.98 0.16 0.877 –0.79 0.92
Keyboard group 0.01 (0.44) 264.03 0.026 0.979 –0.85 0.87
Visuo-spatial skills (at T1) 0.09 (0.03) 144.78 3.13 0.002 0.03 0.15
Letter reading (at T1) 0.05 (0.03) 140.48 1.93 0.056 –0.001 0.11
T3 * stylus group −0.30(0.56) 139.84 –0.54 0.594 –1.42 0.81
T3 * keyboard group −1.15(0.56) 139.13 –2.04 0.043 –2.27 –0.03
Reference: keyboard group
Intercept 7.06 (0.31) 263.75 22.78 < 0.001 6.45 7.67
T3 (Reference = T1) 0.38 (0.41) 140.61 0.94 0.350 –0.42 1.18
Stylus group 0.06 (0.44) 263.63 0.13 0.898 –0.80 0.92
Pencil group −0.01(0.44) 264.03 –0.03 0.979 0.87 0.85
Visuo-spatial skills (at T1) 0.09 (0.03) 144.78 3.13 0.002 0.03 0.15
Letter reading (at T1) 0.05 (0.03) 140.48 1.93 0.056 –0.001 0.11
T3 * stylus group 0.85 (0.57) 141.30 1.48 0.141 –0.28 1.98
T3 * pencil group 1.15 (0.56) 139.13 2.04 0.043 0.034 2.27