Table 2.
Correlation matrix showing correlation between number of errors and reaction time on DANVA-2-Faces and DANVA-2-Voices and within-modality ERP component latencies and amplitudes.
| DANVA-2-Faces # of errors |
DANVA-2-Faces Reaction time |
DANVA-2-Voices #of errors |
DANVA-2-Voices Reaction time |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N170 latency | .33* | .17 | ||
| N250 latency | .21 | .13 | ||
| N170 amplitude | .04 | −.39* | ||
| N250 amplitude | −.12 | .25 | ||
| N100 latency | .44**,a | .17 | ||
| P200 latency | .04 | .09 | ||
| N300 latency | .17 | .30* | ||
| N100 amplitude | .04 | .04 | ||
| P200 amplitude | .04 | .03 | ||
| N300 amplitude | .17 | −.05 | ||
Note. Spearman's rho correlations. All are 1-tailed.
a
Correlation remained significant after controlling for age, IQ, and reaction time.
*
p<.05.
**
p<.01.