Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 27;23:14–25. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2016.11.007

Table 2.

MMN experiment with long vowel deviant: ANOVAs for mean amplitudes in MMN and LDN time windows relative to syllable onset.

TWs (ms) Lateral ROIs
Midline sites
Effect df F/t Effect df F/t
MMN: 150–300 Cond 1,42 96.17** Cond 1,42 81.54**
Cond x Reg
Fron
Cen
Pos
2,84
1,43
1,43
1,43
28.87**
−8.29**
−9.98**
−6.49**
Cond x Site
FZ
CZ
PZ
2,84
1,43
1,43
1,43
16.63**
−8.40**
−8.96**
−7.59**
Cond x Reg x Hem
Left Fron
Left Cen
Left Pos
Right Fron
Right Cen
Right Pos
2,84
1,43
1,43
1,43
1,43
1,43
1,43
5.93*
−7.73**
−9.66**
−6.15**
−8.22**
−9.02**
−5.59**
a
LDN: 500–800 Cond 1,42 81.26** Cond 1,42 83.05**
Cond x Reg
Fron
Cen
Pos
2,84
1,43
1,43
1,43
24.42**
−9.10**
−8.83**
−4.84**
Cond x Site
FZ
CZ
PZ
2,84
1,43
1,43
1,43
24.37**
−9.16**
−9.07**
−5.63**

Cond = condition (deviant vs standard); Reg = region; Fron = frontal; Cen = central; Pos = posterior; Site = electrode site; Hem = hemisphere.

Note that only statistically significant effects are reported.

a

The interaction Cond × Region × Spelling Group F(2,88) = 4.72 did not reveal any significant step-down results involving the factor spelling group and was thus disregarded.

*

p ≤ 0.01.

**

p ≤ 0.001.