Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 14;25:198–208. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2017.03.003

Table 1.

Summary of the channel-by-channel comparisons in Experiment 1. Asterisks mark channels in which the cluster-based permutation analysis yielded an advantage for deviant blocks over standard blocks.

comparison significant channels t-value p-value (uncorrected)
standard vs. baseline
(oxyHb: st > bl)
channel 12 t(19) = 2.76 p = 0.0143
standard vs. baseline (deoxyHb: st < bl) channel 11 t(19) = 2.689 p = 0.0149
deviant vs. baseline
(oxyHb: dev > bl)
channel 8 t(19) = 2.34 p = 0.031
channel 12 t(19) = 2.75 p = 0.015
channel 19 t(19) = 2.16 p = 0.044
channel 21 t(19) = 4.15 p = 0.0005
channel 23 t(19) = 2.59 p = 0.021
channel 24 t(19) = 2.22 p = 0.040
deviant vs. baseline
(deoxyHb: dev < bl)
channel 6 t(19) = 2.27 p = 0.038
channel 11 t(19) = 2.17 p = 0.044
channel 23 t(19) = 2.15 p = 0.047
standard vs. deviant
(oxyHb: dev > st)
channel 3* t(19) = 2.24 p = 0.037
channel 21* t(19) = 2.73 p = 0.013
channel 24* t(19) = 2.22 p = 0.040
standard vs. deviant (deoxyHb: dev < st) channel 6 t(19) = 2.27 p = 0.038
channel 11 t(19) = 2.17 p = 0.044
channel 23 t(19) = 2.15 p = 0.047