Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 28;21:86. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-6484-5

Table 3.

Performance of tools derived from contingency table with Ensembl dataset (n = 114,868,082)

SVM-BPfinder BPP Branchpointer LaBranchoR RNABPS
Cutoff 0.706 5.384 0.653 0.653
TP 166,135 198,708 252,967 171,511 193,430
FP 36,526,998 28,315,554 583,920 40,370,908 30,878,750
TN 72,145,972 86,003,592 114,019,375 74,232,290 83,724,448
FN 84,113 65,422 11,820 93,276 71,357
Missing data 5,944,864 284,806 0 97 97
AUC 0.728 0.819 0.711 0.811
Accuracy 66.39% 75.23% 99.48% 64.77% 73.06%
Sensitivity 66.39% 75.23% 95.54% 64.77% 73.05%
Specificity 66.39% 75.23% 99.49% 64.77% 73.06%
PPV 0.45% 0.70% 30.23% 0.42% 0.62%
NPV 99.88% 99.92% 99.99% 99.87% 99.91%

TP (True Positive), FP (False Positive), TN (True Negative), FN (False Negative), AUC (Area Under the Curve), PPV (Positive Predictive Value), NPV (Negative predictive value)