Table 2.
Variable | Type | Measurement | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
Tree circumference | Continuous | Tree circumference at breast height in cm. Natural logarithm taken |
Sverdrup‐Thygeson et al. (2010) |
Light availability | Continuous | Slope*cos(Aspect−45) | |
Vitality | Categorical (2 levels) |
Healthy: 20% or more living canopy Senescent: <20% living canopy |
Sverdrup‐Thygeson et al. (2017) |
Regrowth | Categorical (3 levels) |
Open: no regrowth around oak Shrubs: low vegetation, shrubs or small trees Trees: trees with height similar to the focal tree |
Sverdrup‐Thygeson et al. (2017) |
Connectivity (8 variables) |
Continuous | Predicted number of hollow oaks within 0.5 km, 1 km, 2 km, 3 km, 4 km, 5 km, 10 km, and 25 km of focal tree |
Skarpaas et al. (2017) |
Habitat class | Categorical (2 levels) |
Forest: tree situated in a forest Open landscape: tree in either a park or agricultural landscape |
Sverdrup‐Thygeson et al. (2010) |
Tree cover density (3 variables) |
Continuous | 20 m: the percent of the 20 m pixel where focal tree is located that is covered by forest. 100 m: the percent of 20 m pixels covered by forests within 100 m radius of focal tree. Standard deviation: the standard deviation of the percent of 20 m pixels covered by forests within 100 m radius of focal tree | CLMS (2012 & 15) |
Trees were either located in forest (n = 38) or open landscapes (n = 23).