Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 8;10(2):819–831. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5940

Table 2.

Variables that described the veteran oak and its surrounding landscape and were used to predict species richness and functional diversity of beetles captured around the tree

Variable Type Measurement Reference
Tree circumference Continuous Tree circumference at breast height in cm. Natural logarithm taken

Sverdrup‐Thygeson et al. (2010)

Light availability Continuous Slope*cos(Aspect−45)

Stage (1976), Stage and Salas (2006)

Vitality Categorical (2 levels)

Healthy: 20% or more living canopy

Senescent: <20% living canopy

Sverdrup‐Thygeson et al. (2017)

Regrowth Categorical (3 levels)

Open: no regrowth around oak

Shrubs: low vegetation, shrubs or small trees

Trees: trees with height similar to the focal tree

Sverdrup‐Thygeson et al. (2017)

Connectivity

(8 variables)

Continuous Predicted number of hollow oaks within 0.5 km, 1 km, 2 km, 3 km, 4 km, 5 km, 10 km, and 25 km of focal tree

Skarpaas et al. (2017)

Habitat class Categorical (2 levels)

Forest: tree situated in a forest

Open landscape: tree in either a park

or agricultural landscape

Sverdrup‐Thygeson et al. (2010)

Tree cover density

(3 variables)

Continuous 20 m: the percent of the 20 m pixel where focal tree is located that is covered by forest. 100 m: the percent of 20 m pixels covered by forests within 100 m radius of focal tree. Standard deviation: the standard deviation of the percent of 20 m pixels covered by forests within 100 m radius of focal tree CLMS (2012 & 15)

Trees were either located in forest (n = 38) or open landscapes (n = 23).