Skip to main content
Conservation Physiology logoLink to Conservation Physiology
. 2020 Jan 29;8(1):coz115. doi: 10.1093/conphys/coz115

Plant hydraulic traits reveal islands as refugia from worsening drought

Aaron R Ramirez 1,2,, Mark E De Guzman 3,2, Todd E Dawson 1,4, David D Ackerly 1,4
Editor: Kevin Hultine
PMCID: PMC6988607  PMID: 32015878

Abstract

Relatively mesic environments within arid regions may be important conservation targets as ‘climate change refugia’ for species persistence in the face of worsening drought conditions. Semi-arid southern California and the relatively mesic environments of California’s Channel Islands provide a model system for examining drought responses of plants in potential climate change refugia. Most methods for detecting refugia are focused on ‘exposure’ of organisms to certain abiotic conditions, which fail to assess how local adaptation or acclimation of plant traits (i.e. ‘sensitivity’) contribute to or offset the benefits of reduced exposure. Here, we use a comparative plant hydraulics approach to characterize the vulnerability of plants to drought, providing a framework for identifying the locations and trait patterns that underlie functioning climate change refugia. Seasonal water relations, xylem hydraulic traits and remotely sensed vegetation indices of matched island and mainland field sites were used to compare the response of native plants from contrasting island and mainland sites to hotter droughts in the early 21st century. Island plants experienced more favorable water relations and resilience to recent drought. However, island plants displayed low plasticity/adaptation of hydraulic traits to local conditions, which indicates that relatively conserved traits of island plants underlie greater hydraulic safety and localized buffering from regional drought conditions. Our results provide an explanation for how California’s Channel Islands function as a regional climate refugia during past and current climate change and demonstrate a physiology-based approach for detecting potential climate change refugia in other systems.

Keywords: chaparral, climate change, climate refugia, drought, hydraulic safety margins, island ecosystems

Introduction

Plants in the 21st century are exposed to hotter and more frequent climate change-driven drought conditions (Breshears et al., 2005; Seager, 2007; Williams et al., 2013; Trenberth et al., 2014; Allen et al., 2015). The persistence of species that experience such abiotic conditions may depend, in part, on the presence of relatively mesic environments within drought-exposed landscapes—i.e. ‘hydrologic refugia’ (McLaughlin et al., 2017; Cartwright, 2018). The detection and protection of such climate change refugia is a key strategy for species conservation (Keppel et al., 2011; Morelli et al., 2016). However, existing methods for detecting refugia that involve modeling the persistence of abiotic conditions within the suitable range for target species or ecosystems (e.g. bioclimate envelope models) do not provide direct information on the sensitivity of target species due to local adaptation or acclimation (Pearson and Dawson, 2003). Assessing both the extent to which species are exposed to climate change driven droughts and how local adaptation and acclimation contribute to species sensitivity is necessary for accurately predicting the responses of ecosystems to future conditions (Williams et al., 2008a; Crausbay et al. 2017).

Frameworks for identifying and assessing conservation targets that are based on a more complete understanding of plant physiological responses to environmental stress are needed to address the threats climate change poses to ecosystems (Madlinger et al., 2018). Comparative trait-based approaches may be able to improve detection of climate change refugia by directly assessing the true vulnerability (exposure + sensitivity) of plants to increasing drought (Fig. 1). Of particular utility in this context is the characterization of traits associated with plant hydraulic function and carbon gain, which can be predictive of drought-induced plant mortality under a warmer, drier future climate (McDowell et al., 2008; Anderegg et al., 2016; Venturas et al., 2017; Choat et al., 2018). While there may be multiple, interacting mechanisms that drive plant mortality during drought (Sala et al., 2010;Jacobsen et al., 2011; Sevanto et al., 2014), the risk of hydraulic failure—i.e. the loss of the ability to transport water due to drought-induced xylem cavitation—is predictive across a wide range of species and ecosystems (Jacobsen et al., 2007b; Choat et al., 2012, 2018; Anderegg et al., 2016; Adams et al., 2017). Measurements of hydraulic traits can be combined with seasonal water relations to estimate ‘hydraulic safety margins’ as the difference between minimum water status (Ψmin) and the xylem pressure potential causing significant xylem dysfunction (e.g. P50). Hydraulic safety margins provide important, comparable information on the hydraulic function of plants experiencing contrasting environmental conditions that can be predictive of future drought-induced mortality (Choat et al., 2012; Skelton et al., 2015; Anderegg et al., 2016).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Conceptual figure depicting two hypothesized relationships between exposure (a and b), sensitivity (c and d) and vulnerability (e and f) that depend on how plant physiological traits vary across gradients. On one hand, if sensitivity is determined by traits that are fine-tuned to local conditions (c)—either through local adaptation or phenotypic plasticity—then there is likely to be static vulnerability across the gradient (e). However, if sensitivity is determined by traits that are relatively conserved across a stress gradient (d), then vulnerability will be reduced in low exposure environments (right).

Islands are generally cooler, wetter and less seasonal than mainland environments due to strong maritime influences on island climate (Weigelt et al., 2013). Such maritime conditions within semi-arid regions like southern California involve increased coastal fog occurrence that may locally buffer plants from exposure to severe drought conditions (Fischer et al., 2009; Vasey et al., 2012; McLaughlin et al., 2017). In addition, modeling approaches suggest that areas with strong coastal influence will experience less pronounced warming over the next century (Lebassi et al., 2009; Potter, 2014). These factors may allow islands to function as regional climate refugia during worsening drought conditions with climate change. However, whether local adaptation and/or phenotypic plasticity of plant hydraulic traits can offset the benefits of more mesic environments is poorly understood. Comparing hydraulic traits and, in particular, hydraulic safety margins of island and mainland plant communities would provide a test of relative drought vulnerability in these contrasting environments.

Southern California and the adjacent California Channel Islands present an ideal study system for evaluating hydraulic safety in island versus mainland environments. During seasonal and inter-annual droughts in this region, mature chaparral shrubs can experience significant dieback and mortality (Schlesinger and Gill, 1978; Schlesinger et al., 1982; Davis et al., 2002, Paddock et al., 2013, Pratt et al., 2014, Venturas et al., 2016). As a result, these environments have selected for plants with highly drought tolerant functional strategies, including many with high xylem cavitation resistance (Ackerly, 2004; Bhaskar et al., 2007; Jacobsen et al., 2008). Previous studies in these systems have shown that cavitation resistance and hydraulic safety can vary seasonally (Jacobsen et al., 2007a, 2014; Pivovaroff et al., 2015) and inter-annually (Jacobsen et al., 2007b) within particular species. Also, hydraulic traits have been shown to vary between species with different life history strategies (Redtfeldt and Davis, 1996; Kolb and Davis, 1994; Davis et al., 1999; Jacobsen et al., 2007b) and across different semi-arid plant communities (i.e. chaparral, coastal sage scrub, and desert scrub) in southern California (Jacobsen et al., 2008). However, few studies have investigated hydraulic traits on the California Channel Islands (But, see Jacobsen et al., 2018), where the maritime climate and geographic isolation of island environments create a high likelihood of evolutionary divergence in adaptive traits (Ackerly, 2003).

In addition, biogeographic patterns of vegetation on the California Channel Islands have long been suspected as evidence of more buffered conditions on the islands that allowed the persistence of taxa once widespread in other parts of California (Axelrod, 1967; Raven and Axelrod, 1978). The existing narrative for this pattern is that the islands provided a cooler, wetter climate that facilitated this persistence. A trait-based approach to testing the hypothesis that the islands function as a climate, and more specifically a hydrologic, refugia could provide a mechanistic explanation for these long-observed biogeographic patterns.

A common limitation of studies that compare traits across environments is not accounting for phylogenetic relationships between taxa, which can make it difficult to interpret trait patterns driven by the statistical non-independence of closely related species (Felsenstein, 1985; Harvey and Pagel, 1991; Maherali et al., 2004). One solution to this problem is to incorporate phylogenetic information that can be used to investigate differences among a series of closely related taxonomic pairs (Westoby et al., 1998; Westoby, 1999; Ackerly, 2000). Collecting data that takes into account the phylogenetic relationships between taxa allows for more accurate linkage of trait patterns to the underlying responses to different environments (Ackerly and Donoghue, 1998).

Here, we present data to assess the relative drought vulnerability of native woody plant communities on the California Channel Islands and the adjacent southern California mainland, sites which harbor similar plant assemblages but differ in the strength of maritime-influence on the local climate (Figs 2 and 3). Our research aims to (i) determine if the maritime climate of island environments is sufficient to buffer native California plants from 21st century drought conditions exacerbated by climate change and (ii) to evaluate a trait-based method for detecting the physiological mechanisms of hydrologic refugia that can be applied to other systems.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Locations (a), mean annual climate (b) and temperature seasonality (c) of southern California region based on historical weather station records (via Western Regional Climate Center: http://www.wrcc.dri.edu). Each closed circle represents climate means from a single weather station. Matched island (Santa Catalina Island) and mainland (Santa Ana Mountains) field sites are indicated by a blue and red star, respectively, in each figure. Despite their proximity and similar mean annual climates, island and mainland field sites are on opposite ends of the temperature seasonality spectrum, with the island site experiencing lower summer and higher winter temperatures (i.e. a more maritime climate). Inset in Fig. 4a shows the study region within the state of California.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Phylogenetic relationships between the 20 species (10 species pairs) included in the study. Relationships are based on a recent phylogenetic supertree (R2G2_20140601; available online). The tree was constructed using the software program phylomatic. Seven of the species pairs represent congeneric pairs, i.e. one species occurring on the mainland and the other on the island. The remaining three pairs are conspecific pairs, where different populations of the same species occur at each site. Single asterisk denotes a species endemic to the CA Channel Islands; double asterisks denote a species endemic to Santa Catalina Island.

Materials and methods

Study sites and species

Matched island and mainland sites were used to compare the seasonal water relations and cavitation resistance of chaparral shrubs on Santa Catalina Island (SCI) and the adjacent southern California mainland. The island site was located on the east (channel-facing) slope of SCI near Blackjack Mountain (33°23′38.1″N; 118°23′50.4″W). The mainland site was located on the east slope of the Santa Ana Mountains in the Cleveland National Forest (33°38′44.6″N; 117°23′46.6″W), overlooking Lake Elsinore, CA (Fig. 2). These sites were selected to maximize similarity in latitude, slope, aspect, elevation, soil characteristics, mean annual precipitation/temperature and species composition across the island–mainland environments (Table 1, Fig. 2).

Table 1.

Summary of site characteristics for matched island and mainland field sites

Site Aspect Elevation Total N (%) Total C (%) Sand/silt/clay (%)
Catalina Island NE 500 m 0.160 ± 0.042 3.037 ± 1.122 62/24/14
Santa Ana Mountains NE 900 m 0.157 ± 0.046 2.398 ± 0.77. 66/21/13

Soil measurements of Total N, Total C and particle size (% sand, % silt and % clay) are based on 0–10 cm soil samples. Soil characteristics are means (n = 6) ± 1 standard error.

Site climate characteristics were estimated from local weather station data managed by the Western Regional Climate Center (http://www.wrcc.dri.edu). Long-term weather information (1897–2016 mainland; 1909–2016 island) was available from stations within 10 km and at similar elevations to both field sites. In addition, site-level temperature and humidity (at 30-min interval) were recorded during the 3-year study using HOBO data loggers placed at each site (Onset Computer Corporation, Bourne, MA, USA). Similarity of soil characteristics was determined by analyzing soil particle size (% sand, % silt and % clay) and soil fertility (Total N and Total C) in the top 10 cm (Table 1). Soil samples (n = 6) were collected within 2 days from both island and mainland field sites and transported to UC Berkeley for processing. Samples were analyzed by the UC Davis Analytical Labs (https://anlab.ucdavis.edu/analysis/Soils/320). In brief, Total N and Total C were quantitatively determined via a combustion method with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD) system and an IR detector. This method is based on the oxidation of the sample during flash combustion that converts nitrogen and carbon substances into combustion gases and has a detection limit of 0.02% for C and N (AOAC Official Method 972.43, 1997). In addition, % sand, % silt and % clay were determined based on settling rates in an aqueous solution using a hydrometer (Sheldrick and Wang, 1993). The chief difference between sites was the strength of the maritime influence on temperature seasonality, with the island site experiencing more moderate conditions—cooler summers and warmer winters—compared to the more seasonally variable and extreme mainland site (Fig. 2).

Ten phylogenetically independent island–mainland taxon pairs (seven congeneric and three conspecific pairs) were used in this study (Fig. 3). The 10 island–mainland pairs were spread across five plant families and were representative of the dominant lineages in southern California chaparral. Included in these pairs were several species endemic to the Channel Islands (Prunus ilicifolia ssp. lyonii, Quercus pacifica, Ceanothus megacarpus var. insularis and Ceanothus arboreus) and one species endemic to Santa Catalina Island (Arctostaphylos catalinae). With one exception, all island–mainland pairs belonged to distinct genera; in the genus Ceanothus taxon pairs were drawn from each of the two distinct subgenera (Ceanothus-Ceanothus and Ceanothus-Cerastes), which often exhibit different functional and life history traits (McMinn, 1942; Nobs, 1963; Ackerly et al., 2006; Fross and Wilken, 2006; Pratt et al., 2008; Burge et al., 2011). Because the experimental design includes comparisons of both congeneric and conspecific pairs, we will refer to all species pairs as ‘taxa’ or ‘taxon pairs’ for clarity.

Seasonal water relations and chlorophyll fluorescence

To determine plant water status, monthly to bi-monthly measurements (March 2012–March 2013) of leaf water potential (Ψw) were estimated using a pressure chamber (PMS Instrument Company, Albany, OR, USA). At predawn (4—6 am; Ψpd) and midday (12—2 pm, Ψmd), leaves of six individuals per taxon (6 indiv. × 10 taxa = 60 samples at each site) were harvested, bagged and placed in an ice chest. Samples were immediately (typically within 30 min.) used to estimate leaf water potential in the field using pressure chambers and attached portable N tanks. Care was taken to select the youngest healthy, fully mature leaves and branchlets exposed to full sun. In addition to analyzing seasonal patterns in Ψpd and Ψmd, the minimum water potential (Ψmin) measured at midday during the end of the dry season (September 2012) was compared between island–mainland taxon pairs. Measurements were always recorded the same day within a site and within 2 days across sites, using the same techniques and equipment.

Stomatal conductance was measured during the study (June 2012–March 2013) using a steady-state leaf porometer (SC-1, Decagon Devices, Pullman, WA). Measurements were performed on six fully mature, sun-exposed leaves per taxon (6 indiv. × 10 taxa = 60 measurements). To account for diurnal fluctuations in atmospheric and solar condition, these measurements were always conducted during the same time of day (9 am—12 pm), during mostly clear (i.e. cloud-free) days. Minimum values of stomatal conductance measured at the end of the dry season (September 2012) were compared across island and mainland sites.

To determine drought stress effects on leaf photosynthetic capacity, intrinsic quantum efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm) was measured at midday during the peak of the dry season (September 2012) using a pulse-modulated chlorophyll fluorometer (FMS2, Hansatech, Pentney, Norfolk, UK). Measurements were conducted on the same individuals measured for seasonal water relations. Prior to measurements, leaves were dark-adapted for 15–20 min using dark adaptation leaf clips (Hansatech, Pentney, Norfolk, UK). Initial fluorescence (Fo) was measured using low levels of light followed by a saturating pulse of light (15 000 μmols m−2 s−1) to measure maximum fluorescence (Fm). Variable fluorescence (Fv) was calculated as initial minus maximum fluorescence and intrinsic quantum efficiency of PSII was expressed as Fv/Fm.

Hydraulic traits and safety margins

To determine the sensitivity of stem xylem to drought conditions, cavitation resistance was estimated with vulnerability curves using a standard centrifuge technique with a conductivity apparatus (Alder et al., 1997; Tobin et al., 2013; Supplementary Fig. S8). Stems approximately 5–6 mm in diameter were harvested from the same six individuals per taxon used for seasonal water relations. The samples were bagged and transported to a laboratory where they were refrigerated until measurements could be performed (within 7 days). Prior to measurements, stems were cut to either 140 or 270 mm long and flushed for 60 min at 100 kPa to remove emboli with an ultra-filtered (0.1 μm pore exclusion filter) solution of deionized and degassed 20 mM KCl solution. The longer stem lengths were used for taxa that had extremely high resistance to cavitation (e.g. Ceanothus spp.) and spun in a larger centrifuge rotor capable of delivering greater levels of centrifugal force to the water column. In some cases, stems were rehydrated overnight under a vacuum using the same degassed 20 mM KCl solution, in place of flushing. Following flushing (or vacuum rehydration), hydraulic conductivity (Kh) of stem xylem was measured using a tubing apparatus under a low-pressure head (about 4 kPa). This gave the maximum Kh (Khmax) with xylem emboli removed. Stems were then spun in a centrifuge to generate negative xylem tension and repeatedly measured to determine loss of Kh with decreasing water potential. Percentage loss of Kh (PLC) was calculated as:

graphic file with name M1.gif

Vulnerability curves were constructed by plotting decreasing values of water potential versus PLC (supplementary materials). Stem-specific hydraulic conductivity (Ks) and cavitation resistance (P50) were estimated from each vulnerability curve. P50 was calculated as the water potential at which 50% of hydraulic conductivity (Kh) was lost due to cavitation of xylem conduits. Ks was calculated by dividing the maximum hydraulic conductivity by the xylem cross-sectional area (mm2). Measurements of P50 were combined with the minimum seasonal water potential measured at the end of the 2012 dry season (Ψmin) to calculate the hydraulic safety margin (HSM50) for each taxon (n = 6):

graphic file with name M2.gif

Vulnerability curves were measured on 9 of the 10 island–mainland taxon pairs in two sampling efforts. Five pairs were measured in Summer/Fall 2010 (Arctostaphylos, Ceanothus-Ceanothus, Ceanothus-Cerastes, Heteromeles and Quercus) and four pairs were measured in Summer/Fall 2012 (Adenostoma, Cercocarpus, Prunus, Rhus). Because vulnerability curves were not calculated for Rhamnus ilicifolia, due to a sampling error, the Rhamnus pair was removed from this analysis. While measurements of vulnerability curves were performed in different years, measurements within taxon pairs were always performed in the same season and year. Therefore, seasonal and inter-annual variation in cavitation resistance (Jacobsen et al., 2007a,b, 2014) should not affect comparisons within taxon pairs.

Some of the taxa measured have known vessel lengths longer than the excised stems used here to measure vulnerability curves (Jacobsen et al., 2012). Recent work has demonstrated that the ‘long vessel artefact’ (Cochard et al., 2010) is not an issue when using standard centrifuge methods like those presented here (Tobin et al., 2013; Hacke et al., 2015; Pratt et al., 2019; Jacobsen et al. 2019; Jacobsen and Pratt et al., 2012; Sperry et al., 2012). However, some readers may still be concerned about such an effect (Skelton et al., 2018). Therefore, in order to demonstrate our findings are robust in the face of current debates on methodology, we have analyzed our hydraulic trait data (P50 and HSM50) in multiple ways to illustrate the effects of different curve shapes on our main findings, which are consistent across alternative analytical approaches (see Supplementary Table S3).

Xylem density (XD) was measured by dividing the dry mass of xylem tissue by its water-saturated volume. To measure XD, ~5 cm long segments were cut from the same stems used to construct vulnerability curves. The segments were cut longitudinally and the pith and bark were removed manually. The segments were then soaked overnight in degassed water brought to a pH of 2. The volume of fully saturated stem segments was determined using Archimedes principle. Following volume measurements, stem segments were dried to a constant weight in a drying oven and dry mass was determined using a four-digit balance.

Remote sensing of drought response

In order to determine if observed trait patterns were associated with broader vegetation responses to recent drought events in our study area, we analyzed the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) derived from Landsat surface reflectance data (NASA/USGS; 30 m resolution), accessed via the Climate Engine web tool (Huntington et al., 2017). EVI is similar to the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), widely used as an index to monitor vegetation health during drought (e.g. Byer and Jin 2017), but optimizes the vegetation signal by reducing noise from canopy background and atmospheric conditions (Liu and Huete, 1995). We generated time series of mean summer EVI (June–August) from 2000 to 2017 for the three California Channel Islands with significant chaparral components (Santa Catalina, Santa Cruz, and Santa Rosa Island). We also generated summer EVI values for chaparral-dominated areas in three south coast mountain ranges (Santa Monica, Santa Ynez, and Santa Ana mountain ranges). These areas were selected because they occur at similar latitudes, elevational ranges, and have similar vegetation composition as the three California Channel Islands analyzed (Supplementary Fig. S1).

We categorized the EVI data into drought and non-drought years based on the U.S. Drought Monitor categorizations for the south coast region. Non-drought years were used to calculate an EVI ``baseline'' for each area. This baseline was then used to quantify departures of EVI from normal conditions by calculating z-scores:

graphic file with name M3.gif

where EVIbaseline and σbaseline represent the mean and interannual standard deviation for baseline years and EVIyear is the mean summer EVI value for a given year. This z-score-based method has recently been shown to track drought-induced declines in vegetation health in the Sierra Nevada Mountains, California, during the recent multi-year drought (Byer and Jin 2017).

Mean z-scores for island and mainland areas were computed and compared for two drought periods: the single-year drought of 2007 and the recent multi-year drought (2012–2017). Special attention was paid to the EVI patterns during and immediately following these two drought events to compare both the drought resistance (magnitude of decline in EVI during drought) and resilience (magnitude of EVI improvement post-drought) of island and mainland vegetation.

Statistical analyses

Seasonal water potential and stomatal conductance were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA with site (island/mainland), taxon-pair and date as independent variables and plant ID (i.e. individual) as a random, nested variable (Supplementary Table S1). Mean values for minimum stomatal conductance, minimum water potential, chlorophyll fluorescence, cavitation resistance, xylem density and hydraulic safety margins were compared using a mixed-model ANOVA with site (island/mainland) as a fixed factor and taxon-pair as a random variable nested within site. This model was used to test for general differences between island–mainland pairs (Supplementary Table S2). Additional pairwise comparisons were used to test for differences within species pairs when a significant site × taxon interaction was detected. A two-way ANOVA was used to compare mean EVI z-scores between island and mainland environments, and pairwise comparisons were used to test for differences during specific drought and post-drought years.

Results

Seasonal water relations

Predawn water potential (Ψpd) varied throughout the study (Fig. 4, Supplementary Table S2, Supplementary Figs S4 and S5) with maximum (least negative) values (Ψmax) recorded during the wet season (March 2012 and 2013) and minimum (most negative) values (Ψmin) recorded during the peak of the dry season (September 2012). Within each site, taxa differed in Ψpd, especially during the dry season (Fig. 4, Supplementary Figs S4 and S5). Shallower-rooted, more cavitation resistant taxa (e.g. Ceanothus-Cerastes and Arctostaphylos) exhibited more negative Ψpd than deeper-rooted, less cavitation resistant taxa (e.g. Heteromeles, Quercus, and Rhus). Differences across sites were 2 MPa lower for mainland vegetation on average (Supplementary Fig. S5), but varied by taxon pair, resulting in a significant site × taxon interaction (Supplementary Table S1). Stomatal conductance (gs) exhibited little variation seasonally (Fig. 4, Supplementary Table S1). However, for most taxa, the lowest values of gs were measured during the peak of the dry season (Fig. 4), suggesting plants experienced drought-induced stomatal closure. Differences across sites varied by taxon pair, resulting in a significant site × taxon interaction (Supplementary Table S1).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Figures showing contrasting climate (a, b), seasonal water potential (c, d) and stomatal conductance (e, f) for island (a, c, e) and mainland (b, d, f) field sites. Climate figures depict monthly averages of max. Temperature (solid line), min. Temperature (dashed line) and precipitation (vertical bars) based on long-term climate data from nearby weather stations (1908–2019). Water potential and stomatal conductance plots depict mean values ±1 SE for each species.

Minimum seasonal water potential, stomatal conductance and chlorophyll fluorescence

During the peak of the dry season (September 2012), predawn water potential (Ψpd), stomatal conductance (gs) and chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm) were higher (more favorable) for island plants compared to mainland relatives (Fig. 5, Supplementary Table S1; P < 0.001). Generally, deep-rooted taxa that resprout after fire (e.g. Rhus, Heteromeles, Prunus) had the highest (least negative) Ψ, while more shallow-rooted, obligate seeders (e.g. Ceanothus-Cerastes, Arctostaphylos) had the most negative water potentials (Figs 5a, 6a, Supplementary Table S2, Supplementary Figs S4 and S5). Deep-rooted resprouters also had the largest differences in gs across sites (Fig. 5b, Supplementary Table S2), but the largest differences in Fv/Fm were observed in non-sprouting Arctostaphylos (Fig. 5c, Supplementary Table S2).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Predawn water potential (a), stomatal conductance (b) and quantum efficiency of PSII (c) measured during the peak of the summer dry season for 10 island–mainland species pairs. Each point represents one species pair. Dashed line is a 1:1 line. A majority of points above the 1:1 line (i.e. blue region) indicate more favorable water relations for island plants. P-values for paired statistical comparisons are depicted in the lower right corner of each plot.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Minimum seasonal water potential (Ψmin; a) and cavitation resistance (P50; b) for island–mainland species pairs. These traits serve as proxies for exposure versus sensitivity to drought and are the components used to estimate hydraulic safety margins and provide a quantitative test of the conceptual model linking physiological trait patterns to detection of climate refugia (Fig. 1). P-values for paired statistical comparisons are depicted in the upper left corner of each plot.

Hydraulic traits and safety margins

None of the measured stem hydraulic traits (Ks, P50, or XD) were consistently different between island—mainland sites (P > 0.05; Supplementary Table S2). Significant pairwise comparisons of Ks were recorded for Ceanothus-Ceanothus, Adenostoma, Cercocarpus and Prunus. Resistance to drought-induced cavitation (P50) varied widely between taxa, with similar ranges at each site (−1 to −11 MPa; Fig. 6). However, there were no consistent differences between island–mainland taxon pairs (F1,94 = 3.952; P = 0.117). Only Heteromeles exhibited a significant pairwise comparison, with greater resistance on the mainland (P < 0.05; Supplementary Table S2). Xylem density, XD, was also not consistently different between island–mainland relatives (F1,109 = 0.405; P = 0.526). None of the pairwise comparisons of XD were significantly different (P < 0.05; Supplementary Table S2).

Hydraulic safety margins (HSM50) also varied widely between taxa (−4 to +5 MPa; Fig. 7). Nine of 18 taxa measured had negative safety margins, suggesting they are likely to experience > 50% loss of hydraulic conductivity during the peak of the dry season (some of the negative safety margins may reflect long-vessel artifacts affecting the P50 values). In general, taxa maintained the same ranking in safety margin across sites—i.e. taxa with high safety margins relative to other taxa on the mainland also had high safety margins on the island. Importantly, island taxa had consistently higher safety margins (F1,94 = 37.950; P < 0.01) with significant pairwise comparisons in 7 out of 9 taxon pairs (Fig. 7). Our findings of no difference in P50 and strong differences in HSM50 between island–mainland taxa are consistent whether or not long-vesseled taxa are included in the analysis (Table S3).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Box plots of hydraulic safety margins (HSM50 = Ψmin—P50) for nine island-mainland species pairs. Blue background indicates higher safety margin for island species (8/9 pairs); red background indicates lower safety margin for island species (1/9 pairs). Asterisks denote significant pairwise comparisons (P < 0.05).

Remote sensing of responses to recent drought

Interannual variation in mean summer EVI z-scores allowed for meaningful comparison of island and mainland vegetation responses to recent drought events (Fig. 8). During the extreme drought conditions across southern California that took place in 2007 (single-year drought), island plants experienced less-pronounced reductions in summer EVI compared to mainland areas (P < 0.05). In addition, the island vegetation rebounded more quickly in the first year after the drought (P < 0.05). The patterns were similar during the recent ‘exceptional’ multi-year drought (2012–2016). However, during the third and fourth years of the drought, increased variability in island EVI resulted in no statistically significant differences between island and mainland environments during these years. The island plants also had more favorable EVI response following the multi-year drought (P < 0.05).

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Time-series of mean summer (JJA). Enhanced Vegetation Index in southern California island and mainland environments (a). Recent acute (single year; 2007) and chronic (multi-year; 2012–2017) drought events are shaded in gray. Lower panel (b) shows U.S. Drought Monitor categorizations for the South Coast region (U.S. Drought Monitor:http://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/) during the same time interval. Island EVI is averaged from Santa Catalina, Santa Cruz and Santa Rosa Islands, which all have significant island chaparral components. Mainland EVI is averaged from chaparral-dominated areas in the Santa Monica, Santa Ynez and Santa Ana ranges. EVI averages were generated by combining surface reflectance data from Landsat 4/5/7/8 using the Climate Engine web tool (https://app.climateengine.org/). Asterisks denote significant differences during drought years and years immediately following drought (i.e. recovery years).

Discussion

Conservative traits result in greater hydraulic safety for island plants

We did not observe consistent differences in cavitation resistance (P50) between island–mainland sites. This lack of a difference in P50 between sites with different levels of water availability is surprising considering global meta-analyses that show P50 values closely match environmental patterns of water availability (e.g. Choat et al., 2012). This ‘fine-tuning’ of plant hydraulics to current environmental conditions suggests that on a global scale plants are similarly at risk of hydraulic failure, despite differences in water availability and functional strategies. However, our findings suggest that there may be important exceptions on a regional to local scale, where P50 does not closely track patterns of water availability. This is consistent with studies comparing hydraulic traits between intraspecific populations in coastal and drier interior sites (Jacobsen and Pratt, 2013; Jacobsen et al., 2014), as well as community-level analyses of different semi-arid plant communities (Jacobsen et al., 2007a).

It is not clear why island taxa possess levels of cavitation resistance similar to mainland relatives living in drier environments. One hypothesis for the disparity between water availability and P50 is that cavitation resistance arises from selection at the seedling stage, when the risk of drought-induced cavitation is high due to a small, developing root system’s need to provide enough water for a rapidly growing shoot (Frazer and Davis, 1988; Thomas and Davis 1989; Schwilk and Ackerly, 2005; Pratt et al., 2008). Another hypothesis is that cavitation thresholds are set during severe episodic droughts (Pockman and Sperry, 2000), suggesting that water availability and P50 may be decoupled during more normal conditions. However, in order for these hypotheses to explain the patterns in the present study, water stress would have to be similar between island and mainland plants at the seedling stage but not at the adult stage, or island and mainland plants would need to experience similar conditions during episodic droughts but not during the intervening years. Neither of these explanations seems very likely considering the consistent gradient in climate that exists between the island and mainland environments (Fig. 2; Weigelt et al., 2013).

Another factor that may explain the lack of P50 differences between island–mainland pairs is the weak relationship between hydraulic safety and hydraulic efficiency. In studies that account for phylogenetic similarity, no correlation between P50 and hydraulic conductivity (Ks) is typically observed (Maherali et al., 2004; Bhaskar et al., 2007; Jacobsen et al., 2007b). Therefore, it is possible that the trade-offs between hydraulic safety and efficiency are not strong enough to drive selection against high cavitation resistance once it has evolved in a lineage. Consistent with this are studies that have shown cavitation resistance to be a highly conserved trait (Lamy et al., 2011; Hao et al., 2008; Wilson et al., 2008; Pittermann et al., 2012). In the present study, we are comparing island lineages, most likely descended from mainland taxa that migrated to the islands to their contemporary mainland relatives. Colonization of the island by mainland taxa occurred at some point during the approximately 500 000 years that the island has been continuously above water (Schoenherr et al., 1999). It is possible that island plants have retained the high cavitation resistance of their mainland ancestors due to weak selection against it, coupled with the relatively short time that they have been isolated on the island environment.

In general, few studies examine the spatial and temporal variation in hydraulic traits (Anderegg, 2015). Of those that do, similar evidence of low variability across environmental gradients is often observed (e.g. Jacobsen and Pratt, 2013; Jacobsen et al., 2014; Skelton et al., 2019). The observed low spatial variability in hydraulic traits may be explained, in part, by high phylogenetic conservatism in such traits (Lamy et al., 2011; Hao et al., 2008; Pittermann et al., 2012; Skelton et al., 2018), This suggests that many plants may be relatively protected from hydraulic failure compared to close relatives or ecotypes in comparatively drier environments. Therefore, hydrologic refugia capable of buffering plants from hydraulic failure may be common in nature.

The lack of variation in hydraulic traits does not preclude variation in other important functional traits that allow island taxa to achieve a ‘fit’ with their contemporary environment. Hochberg (1980) first analyzed differences in leaf traits between island and mainland shrubs native to southern California, finding that island plants exhibited more mesomorphic (i.e. drought-sensitive) traits. In addition, Bowen and Vuren (1997) found that plants from Santa Cruz Island, California, possessed less robust leaves that made them preferred forage for exotic herbivores. Salladay and Ramirez (2018) found similar results for leaves of several island plant species on Santa Catalina Island. Either stronger selection or greater phenotypic plasticity in leaf traits may explain the differences observed between these previous studies and the current one.

Island plants are buffered from seasonal and interannual drought conditions

Despite similar precipitation regimes, island plants had higher water availability and experienced less water stress during the dry season as evidenced by higher (less negative) water potentials, higher stomatal conductance and higher chlorophyll fluorescence. Furthermore, remotely sensed health (via EVI analysis) of island plants was less impacted by recent drought events. These findings are consistent with a recent study comparing the dry season water relations of Arctostaphylos spp. in maritime versus interior chaparral sites in California (Vasey et al., 2012; Jacobsen and Pratt, 2013). In that study, water relations differences between maritime and interior Arctostaphylos populations were explained by the reduced evaporative demand and increased inputs from fog that are characteristic of coastal California environments. It is likely that these factors—reduced evaporative demand and increased summertime fog—also affect plant water relations on the California Channel Islands (Williams et al., 2008b; Fischer et al., 2009; Carbone et al., 2011; Taylor et al., 2019; Supplementary Fig. S3).

Another factor that may be related to dry season water relations in island and mainland sites is reduced shrub density resulting from prior land use patterns. Island chaparral communities on SCI are less dense, exhibiting a more open canopy structure than mainland chaparral communities (Hochberg, 1980; Minnich, 1982; Schoenherr et al., 1999; Supplementary Fig. S6). This pattern is thought to largely be an artifact of 19th and 20th century land use practices on SCI—specifically, overgrazing by feral animals—and may not reflect the ‘natural’ state of SCI plant communities (Minnich, 1982; Rick et al., 2014). Previous studies in southern California chaparral and coastal sage communities have shown that decreased transpiration and improved water availability are associated with low woody vegetation density (Ng and Miller, 1980; Poole and Miller, 1975).

Reducing stand density and competition for water is hypothesized to improve individual plant water relations and is a theoretical justification for the thinning of forest stands as a strategy for managing drought impacts (Grant et al., 2013; McDowell and Allen, 2015; Bradford and Bell, 2017). It is possible that a similar process takes place in SCI chaparral communities where the altered canopy structure (i.e. reduced stand density) results in reduced competition by woody plants for deeper water sources, leaving more water available to the remaining individuals in the community (Hochberg, 1980). However, recent work from another semi-arid system finds little evidence for this ‘moisture release hypothesis’, suggesting instead that any reductions in competition are offset by increased water loss from exposed soil, wind and changes in hydraulic redistribution (Morillas et al., 2017). It should also be noted that the potential role of introduced herbivores in improving outcomes of island plants is limited. Ramirez et al. (2012) found that browsing by mule deer on Santa Catalina Island caused high post-fire mortality—presumably, via carbon starvation—despite these populations having a reduced risk of hydraulic failure compared to the mainland. Future studies designed to isolate the effects of maritime climate and stand density may help determine their independent roles in determining seasonal water relations of plants in this system.

While increased buffering of mature island chaparral shrubs was observed in the present study, drought stress may still play an important role in island sites through impacts to post-fire seedlings and resprouts, as well as localized impacts on drought-sensitive species. In a recent study of three island chaparral species from Catalina Island, Jacobsen et al. (2018) found that seedlings recruiting after a recent fire experienced high levels of mortality and that cavitation resistance was predictive of these mortality patterns. In addition, indirect effects of drought such as increased browsing pressure on delicate regenerating vegetation during drought years may contribute to post-fire mortality patterns (Ramirez et al., 2012). On Santa Cruz Island, southern California, bishop pines (Pinus muricata D. Don) have experienced drought-related mortality during recent drought events (Baguskas et al., 2016; Taylor et al., 2019). Furthermore, there may be limits to the buffering observed in the present study for drought-tolerant chaparral species that will be crossed during continued warming, drying climate trends. Like other climate change refugia, the persistence of species and ecosystems in hydrologic refugia may only provide a temporary climate buffer (Millar et al., 2007; Morelli et al., 2016; McLaughlin et al., 2017).

Hydraulic safety reveals hydrologic refugia

The improved safety margins we observed in island chaparral shrubs may allow them to fare better during episodes of increasing aridity. Greater hydraulic safety in island plants indicates that they are able to tolerate greater declines in minimum seasonal water potential before they experience the same amount of drought-induced cavitation as mainland relatives. Our remote sensing of island vegetation responses during recent droughts suggests this buffering may improve drought resistance and resilience in these environments. Therefore, as the regional patterns of climate change in California trend towards warmer, drier conditions, chaparral shrubs living on the California Channel Islands may experience less drought-induced cavitation, fewer declines in performance and lower rates of mortality compared to mainland plants with lower hydraulic safety margins.

Improved safety margins may also have been a factor during past episodes of climate change, contributing to the pattern of relictual endemism on the California Channel Islands. Many of the woody endemics on the California Channel Islands are thought to be remnant populations of lineages that once had broader distributions (Axelrod, 1967; Raven and Axelrod, 1978; Schoenherr et al., 1999). The general explanation offered for this pattern of relictual endemism on the California Channel Islands is that changing climatic conditions since the late Tertiary has resulted in extirpation of mainland populations and persistence of island populations due to more favorable climate and reduced competition in insular environments. Our findings allow for such explanations to be taken a step further by suggesting that reduced risk of hydraulic failure may have contributed to woody plant lineages persisting on the California Channel Islands during past transitions to warmer, drier climates.

In conclusion, insular plant communities off the coast of southern California have more favorable hydraulic traits that underlie greater resistance and resilience to seasonal and interannual droughts. This buffering is associated with the finding that island plants do not appear to have ‘fine-tuned’ their stem hydraulic traits in response to the higher water availability in their current insular environment and, therefore, have a reduced risk of hydraulic failure. This pattern of improved hydraulic safety in island plants may have contributed to current biogeographic patterns of endemic island lineages and may continue to buffer island plants from hotter, drier conditions associated with anthropogenic climate change in this or other systems. Furthermore, the identification of high safety margin taxa or ecotypes using the comparative methods described here may be a useful approach to guide management efforts aimed at the detection of climate change refugia (Keppel et al., 2011; Morelli et al., 2016). The present study adds to the growing body of literature suggesting that hydraulic traits and hydraulic safety margins, in particular, are a valuable set of tools for predicting the impacts of drought on plant communities and that similar comparisons of hydraulic traits in other ecosystems may reveal additional hydrologic refugia important to species persistence in the face of a warmer, drier future.

Supplementary Material

revised_coz115

Acknowledgements

The Catalina Island Conservancy, especially Jamie King, Peter Dixon, Ben Coleman, Linda Farley and Sarah Ratay, provided access to the island and accommodations during field research trips. The Cleveland National Forest, Trabuco Ranger District, provided access to the Santa Ana Mountains field site. We would like to thank the Davis lab at Pepperdine University, the Pratt Lab and Jacobsen Lab at CSU Bakersfield and the Santiago Lab at UC Riverside for loaning field/lab equipment and lab space that was vital to the completion of this work. We also thank the many great field and lab assistants for their help: Jenn Mahley, Ryan Salladay, Danica Witter, Jonathan Barber, Carli Baker, Kelsey Clausing, Brian Trinh, Darko Cotoras, Nissa Kreider, John Ezaki, Aditi Dubey, Katie Fitzgerald, Gilbert Uribe, Emanuel Garcia, Scott Gordon, Joe Ramirez and Keil McGrath.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program, Sigma Xi’s Grants-in-Aid Research Program, the Lawrence R. Heckard Endowment via the UC Jepson Herbarium, and the Murdock Foundation’s Faculty Startup Grant [all to ARR].

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at Conservation Physiology online

References

  1. Ackerly DD. (2000) Taxon sampling, correlated evolution, and independent contrasts. Evolution 54: 1480–1492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ackerly DD. (2003) Community assembly, niche conservatism, and adaptive evolution in changing environments. Int J Plant Sci 164: 165–184. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ackerly DD. (2004) Functional strategies of chaparral shrubs in relation to seasonal water deficit and disturbance. Ecol Monogr, 74(1): 25–44. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ackerly DD, Donoghue MJ (1998) Leaf size, sapling allometry, and Corner’s rules: a phylogenetic study of correlated evolution in maples (Acer). Am Nat 152: 767–791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ackerly DD, Schwilk DW, Webb CO (2006) Niche evolution and adaptive radiation: testing the order of trait divergence. Ecology 87: S50–S61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Adams HD, et al. (2017) A multi-species synthesis of physiological mechanisms in drought-induced tree mortality. Nat Ecol Evol 1: 1285–1291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Anderegg WRL. (2015) Spatial and temporal variation in plant hydraulic traits and their relevance for climate change impacts on vegetation. New Phytol 205: 1008–1014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Anderegg WRL, Klein T, Bartlett M, Sack L, Pellegrini AFA, Choat B, Jansen S (2016) Meta-analysis reveals that hydraulic traits explain cross-species patterns of drought-induced tree mortality across the globe. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113: 5024–5029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Alder NN, Pockman WT, Sperry JS, Nuismer S (1997) Use of centrifugal force in the study of xylem cavitation. J Exp Bot 48: 665–674. [Google Scholar]
  10. Allen CD, Breshears DD, McDowell NG (2015) On underestimation of global vulnerability to tree mortality and forest die-off from hotter drought in the Anthropocene. Ecosphere, 6(8), 1–55. [Google Scholar]
  11. AOAC Official Method 972.43 (1997) Chapter 12: Microchemical determination of carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen, automated method In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, Ed16th AOAC International, Arlington, VA, pp. 5–6 [Google Scholar]
  12. Axelrod DI. (1967) Geologic history of the Californian insular flora In Philbrick RN, ed, Proceedings of the symposium on the biology of the California Islands. Santa Barbara Botanic Garden, Santa Barbara, CA, pp. 267–315. [Google Scholar]
  13. Baguskas SA, Still CJ, Fischer DT, D’Antonio CM, King JY (2016) Coastal fog during summer drought improves the water status of sapling trees more than adult trees in a California pine forest. Oecologia 181: 137–148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Byer S, Jin Y (2017) Detecting Drought-Induced Tree Mortality in Sierra Nevada Forests with Time Series of Satellite Data. Remote Sensing 9: 929. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bhaskar R, Valiente-Banuet A, Ackerly DD (2007) Evolution of hydraulic traits in closely related species pairs from mediterranean and nonmediterranean environments of North America. New Phytol 176: 718–726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bowen L, Vuren DV (1997) Insular endemic plants lack defenses against herbivores. Conserv Biol 11: 1249–1254. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bradford JB, Bell DM (2017) A window of opportunity for climate-change adaptation: easing tree mortality by reducing forest basal area. Front Ecol Environ 15: 11–17. [Google Scholar]
  18. Breshears DD, Cobb NS, Rich PM, Price KP, Allen CD, Balice RG, Romme WH, Kastens JH, Floyd ML, Belnap J et al. (2005) Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102: 15144–15148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Burge DO, Erwin DM, Islam MB, Kellermann J, Kembel SW, Wilken DH, Manos PS. 2011. Diversification of Ceanothus (Rhamnaceae) in the California Floristic Province. Int J Plant Sci, 172(9), 1137–1164. [Google Scholar]
  20. Carbone MS, Still CJ, Ambrose AR, Dawson TE, Williams AP, Boot CM, Schaeffer SM, Schimel JP (2011) Seasonal and episodic moisture controls on plant and microbial contributions to soil respiration. Oecologia 167: 265–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Cartwright J. (2018) Landscape Topoedaphic features create Refugia from drought and insect disturbance in a Lodgepole and Whitebark pine forest. Forests, 9(11), 715–735. [Google Scholar]
  22. Choat B, Jansen S, Brodribb TJ, Cochard H, Delzon S, Bhaskar R, Bucci SJ, Feild TS, Gleason SM, Hacke UG et al. (2012) Global convergence in the vulnerability of forests to drought. Nature 491: 752–755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Choat B, Brodribb TJ, Brodersen CR, Duursma RA, López R, Medlyn BE (2018) Triggers of tree mortality under drought. Nature 558: 531–539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Crausbay SD, Ramirez AR, Carter SL, Cross MS, Hall KR, Bathke DJ, Betancourt JL, Colt S, Cravens AE, Dalton MS et al. (2017) Defining Ecological Drought for the Twenty-First Century. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 98: 2543–2550. [Google Scholar]
  25. Cochard H, Herbette S, Barigah T, Badel E, Ennajeh M, Vilagrosa A (2010) Does sample length influence the shape of xylem embolism vulnerability curves? A test with the Cavitron spinning technique: Shape of xylem embolism vulnerability curves. Plant, Cell & Environment 33(9):1543-52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Davis S, Ewers F, Sperry J (2002) Shoot dieback during prolonged drought in Ceanothus (Rhamnaceae) chaparral of California: a possible case of hydraulic failure. J Bot 89(5): 820–828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Davis SD, Wood J, Reeves JJ, Kolb KJ (1999) Differential susceptibility to xylem cavitation among three pairs of Ceanothus species in the Transverse Mountain ranges of southern California. Ecoscience 6: 180–186. [Google Scholar]
  28. Felsenstein J. (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125: 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  29. Fischer D. T., Still C. J., & Williams A. P (2009) Significance of summer fog and overcast for drought stress and ecological functioning of coastal California endemic plant species. J Biogeogr, 36(4), 783–799. [Google Scholar]
  30. Frazer JM, Davis SD (1988) Differential survival of chaparral seedlings during the first summer drought after wildfire. Oecologia, 76(2), 215–221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Fross D, Wilken D (2006) Ceanothus. Timber, Portland, OR. [Google Scholar]
  32. Grant GE, Tague CL, Allen CD (2013) Watering the forest for the trees: an emerging priority for managing water in forest landscapes. Front Ecol Environ 11: 314–321. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hacke UG, Venturas MD, MacKinnon ED, Jacobsen AL, Sperry JS, Pratt RB (2015) The standard centrifuge method accurately measures vulnerability curves of long-vesselled olive stems. New Phytol 205: 116–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hao G-Y, Hoffman WA, Scholz FG, Bucci SJ, Meinzer FC, Franco AC, Cao K-F, Goldstein C (2008) Stem and leaf hydraulics of congeneric tree species from adjacent tropical savanna and forest ecosystems. Oecologia 155: 405–415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Harvey PH, Pagel M (1991) The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. [Google Scholar]
  36. Hochberg MC. (1980) Factors Affecting Leaf Size of the Chaparral Shrubs Ceanothus Megacarpa, Dendromecon Rigida, and Prunus ilicifolia on the California Islands. [MA thesis], Botany, UC Santa Barbara. [Google Scholar]
  37. Huntington JL, Hegewisch KC, Daudert B, Morton CG, Abatzoglou JT, McEvoy DJ, Erickson T (2017) Climate Engine: Cloud Computing and Visualization of Climate and Remote Sensing Data for Advanced Natural Resource Monitoring and Process Understanding. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 98: 2397–2410. [Google Scholar]
  38. Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB (2012) No evidence for an open vessel effect in centrifuge-based vulnerability curves of a long-vesselled liana (Vitis vinifera). New Phytologist 194: 982–990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Alleman D, Davis SD (2018) Post-Fire Ecophysiology of Endemic Chaparral Shrub Seedlings From Santa Catalina Island, Southern California. Madroño 65: 106–116. [Google Scholar]
  40. Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Tobin MF, Hacke UG, Ewers FW (2012) A global analysis of xylem vessel length in woody plants. Am. J. Bot 99: 1583–1591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB (2013) Vulnerability to cavitation of central California Arctostaphylos (Ericaceae): a new analysis. Oecologia, 171(2), 329–334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Ewers FW (2007a) Cavitation resistance and seasonal hydraulics differ among three arid Californian plant communities. Plant Cell Environ 30: 1599–1609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Ewers FW (2007b) Cavitation resistance among 26 chaparral species of southern California. Ecol Monogr, 77(1): 99–115. [Google Scholar]
  44. Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Ewers FW (2008) Comparative community physiology: nonconvergence in water relations among three semi-arid shrub communities. New Phytol, 180(1): 100–113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Jacobsen AL, Roets F, Jacobs SM, Esler KJ, & Pratt RB (2011). Dieback and mortality of South African fynbos shrubs is likely driven by a novel pathogen and pathogen-induced hydraulic failure. Austral Ecol, 37(2), 227–235. [Google Scholar]
  46. Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Tobin MF (2014) Geographic and seasonal variation in chaparral vulnerability to cavitation. Madrono, 61(4), 317–327. [Google Scholar]
  47. Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Venturas MD, Hacke UG, Lens F (2019) Large volume vessels are vulnerable to water-stress-induced embolism in stems of poplar. IAWA J 40: 4–S4. [Google Scholar]
  48. Keppel G, Van Niel KP, Wardell-Johnson GW, Yates CJ, Byrne M, Mucina L, Schut AGT, Hopper SD, Franklin SE (2011) Refugia: identifying and under- standing safe havens for biodiversity under climate change. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21: 393–404. [Google Scholar]
  49. Kolb KJ, Davis SD (1994) Drought tolerance and xylem embolism in co-occurring species of coastal sage and chaparral. Ecology 75(3), 648–659. [Google Scholar]
  50. Lamy J-B, Bouffier L, Burlett R, Plomion C, Cochard H, Delzon S (2011) Uniform Selection as a Primary Force Reducing Population Genetic Differentiation of Cavitation Resistance across a Species Range. PLoS ONE 6: e23476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Lebassi B, Gonzalez J, Fabris D, Maurer E, Miller N, Milesi C, Switzer P, Bornstein R (2009) Observed 1970–2005 cooling of summer daytime temperatures in coastal California. J Clim 22: 3558–3573. [Google Scholar]
  52. Liu HQ, Huete A (1995) A feedback based modification of the NDVI to minimize canopy background and atmospheric noise. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 33: 457–465. [Google Scholar]
  53. Madliger CL, Love OP, Hultine KR, Cooke SJ (2018) The conservation physiology toolbox: status and opportunities. Conserv Physiol 6: 1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Maherali H, Pockman WT, Jackson RB (2004) Adaptive variation in the vulnerability of woody plants to xylem cavitation. Ecology, 85(8), 2184–2199. [Google Scholar]
  55. McDowell NG, Allen CD (2015) Darcy's law predicts widespread forest mortality under climate warming. Nat Clim Chang 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  56. McDowell N, Pockman WT, Allen CD (2008) Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? New Phytol 178: 719–739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. McLaughlin BC, Ackerly DD, Klos PZ, Natali J, Dawson TE, & Thompson SE (2017) Hydrologic refugia, plants, and climate change. Glob Chang Biol, 66(8), 107–2961. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. McMinn HE. (1942) A systematic study of the genus Ceanothus In Van Rensselaer M, McMinn HE, eds, Ceanothus. Santa Barbara Botanic Garden, Santa Barbara, CA, pp. 131–279. [Google Scholar]
  59. Millar CI, Stephenson NL, Stephens SL (2007) Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecol Appl 17: 2145–2151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Minnich RA. (1982) Grazing, fire and the management of vegetation on Santa Catalina Island, California In Conrad CE, Oechel WC, eds, Proceedings of the Symposium on Dynamics and Management of Mediterranean-type Eco-systems. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report. PSW-58, pp. 444–449.
  61. Morillas L, Pangle RE, Maurer GE, Pockman WT, McDowell N, Huang C-W, Krofcheck DJ, Fox AM, Sinsabaugh RL, Rahn TA et al. (2017) Tree Mortality Decreases Water Availability and Ecosystem Resilience to Drought in Piñon-Juniper Woodlands in the Southwestern U.S.: Tree Mortality in Semiarid Biomes. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 122: 3343–3361. [Google Scholar]
  62. Morelli TL, Daly C, Dobrowski SZ, Dulen DM, Ebersole JL, Jackson ST, Lundquist JD, Millar CI, Maher SP, Monahan WB et al. (2016) Managing Climate Change Refugia for Climate Adaptation. PLoS ONE 11: e0159909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Ng E, Miller PC (1980) Soil moisture relations in the southern California chaparral. Ecology 98–107. [Google Scholar]
  64. Nobs MA. (1963) Experimental Studies on Species Relationships in Ceanothus Monograph Series, no. 623. Carnegie Institution for Science, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  65. Paddock W, Davis SD, Pratt RB, Jacobsen A, Tobin MF, López-Portillo J, Ewers FW (2013) Factors determining mortality of adult chaparral shrubs in an extreme drought year in California. Aliso 31: 49–57. [Google Scholar]
  66. Pearson RG, Dawson TP (2003) Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Glob Ecol Biogeogr, 12(5), 361–371. [Google Scholar]
  67. Pittermann J, Stuart SA, Dawson TE, Moreau A (2012) Cenozoic climate change shaped the evolutionary ecophysiology of the Cupressaceae conifers. PNAS, 109(24), 9647–9652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Pivovaroff AL, Pasquini SC, De Guzman ME, Alstad KP, Stemke JS, Santiago LS (2015) Multiple strategies for drought survival among woody plant species. Funct Ecol . doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12518. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Pockman W, Sperry J (2000) Vulnerability to xylem cavitation and the distribution of Sonoran desert vegetation. Am J Bot 87(9): 1287–1299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Poole DK, Miller PC (1975) Water relations of selected species of chaparral and coastal sage communities. Ecology 56: 1118–1128. [Google Scholar]
  71. Potter C. (2014) Understanding climate change on the California coast: accounting for extreme daily events among long-term trends. Climate, 2(1), 18–27. [Google Scholar]
  72. Pratt R, Jacobsen AL, Mohla R (2008) Linkage between water stress tolerance and life history type in seedlings of nine chaparral species (Rhamnaceae). J Ecol 96: 1252–1265. [Google Scholar]
  73. Pratt RB, Jacobsen AL, Ramirez AR, Helms AM, Traugh CA, Tobin MF, Heffner MS, Davis SD (2014) Mortality of resprouting chaparral shrubs after a fire and during a record drought: physiological mechanisms and demographic consequences. Glob Change Biol 20: 893–907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Pratt RB, Castro V, Fickle JC, Jacobsen AL (2019) Embolism resistance of different aged stems of a California oak species (Quercus douglasii): optical and microCT methods differ from the benchtop-dehydration standard. Tree Physiol DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpz092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Ramirez AR, Pratt RB, Jacobsen AL, Davis SD (2012) Exotic deer diminish post-fire resilience of native shrub communities on Santa Catalina Island. southern California. Plant Ecol 213: 1037–1047. [Google Scholar]
  76. Raven PH, Axelrod DI (1978) Origin and relationships of the California flora. Univ Calif Publ Bot 72: 1–134. [Google Scholar]
  77. Redtfeldt RA, Davis SD (1996) Physiological and morphological evidence of niche segregation between two co-occurring species of Adenostoma in California chaparral. Ecoscience 3: 290–296. [Google Scholar]
  78. Rick TC, Sillett TS, Ghalambor CK, Hofman CA, Ralls K, Anderson RS, Boser CL, Braje TJ, Cayan DR, Chesser RT et al. (2014) Ecological Change on California’s Channel Islands from the Pleistocene to the Anthropocene. BioScience 64: 680–692. [Google Scholar]
  79. Sala A, Piper F, Hoch G (2010) Physiological mechanisms of drought-induced tree mortality are far from being resolved: Letters. New Phytologist 186: 274–281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Salladay RA, Ramirez AR (2018) Reduced defenses and increased herbivore preference of island chaparral shrubs compared to mainland relatives. West N Am Nat 78: 768. [Google Scholar]
  81. Schlesinger WH, Gill DS (1978) Demographic studies of the chaparral shrub, Ceanothus megacarpus, in the Santa Ynez Mountains, California. Ecology 59: 1256–1263. [Google Scholar]
  82. Schlesinger WH, Gray JT, Gill DS, Mahall BE (1982) Ceanothus megacarpus chaparral: a synthesis of ecosystem processes during development and annual growth. Bot Rev 48: 71–117. [Google Scholar]
  83. Schoenherr AA, Feldmeth CR, Emerson MJ (1999) Natural History of the Islands of California. University of California Press, Berkeley. [Google Scholar]
  84. Schwilk DW, Ackerly DD (2005) Is there a cost to resprouting? Seedling growth rate and drought tolerance in sprouting and nonsprouting Ceanothus (Rhamnaceae). Am J Bot, 92(3), 404–410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Seager R. (2007) The turn of the century north American drought: global context, dynamics, and past analogs. J Clim 20: 5527–5552. [Google Scholar]
  86. Sevanto S, Mcdowell NG, Dickman LT, Pangle R, Pockman WT (2014) How do trees die? A test of the hydraulic failure and carbon starvation hypotheses: How do trees die? Plant Cell Environ 37: 153–161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Sheldrick BH, Wang C (1993) Particle-size distribution In Carter MR, ed, Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. Canadian Society of Soil Science, Lewis Publishers, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 499–511. [Google Scholar]
  88. Skelton RP, Anderegg LDL, Papper P, Reich E, Dawson TE, Kling M, Thompson SE, Diaz J, Ackerly DD (2019) No local adaptation in leaf or stem xylem vulnerability to embolism, but consistent vulnerability segmentation in a North American oak. New Phytol 223: 1296–1306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Skelton RP, Dawson TE, Thompson SE, Shen Y, Weitz AP, Ackerly D (2018) Low vulnerability to xylem embolism in leaves and stems of north American oaks. Plant Physiol 177: 1066–1077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Skelton RP, West AG, Dawson TE (2015) Predicting plant vulnerability to drought in biodiverse regions using functional traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 112 (18), 5744–5749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Sperry JS, Christman MA, Torres-Ruiz JM, Taneda H, Smith DD (2012) Vulnerability curves by centrifugation: is there an open vessel artefact, and are ‘r’ shaped curves necessarily invalid?: Vulnerability curves by centrifugation. Plant, Cell & Environment 35: 601–610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Taylor A, Biswas T, Randall JM, Klausmeyer K, Cohen B (2019) Parched pines: a quantitative comparison of two multi-year droughts and associated mass mortalities of bishoppine (Pinus muricata) on Santa Cruz Island, California. Remote Sens Ecol Conserv. doi: 10.1002/rse2.123. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  93. Thomas C, Davis S (1989) Recovery patterns of three chaparral shrub species after wildfire. Oecologia 80: 309–320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Tobin MF, Pratt RB, Jacobsen AL, De Guzman ME (2013) Xylem vulnerability to cavitation can be accurately characterised in species with long vessels using a centrifuge method. Plant Biology 15: 496–504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Trenberth KE, Dai A, van der Schrier G, Jones PD, Barichivich J, Briffa KR, Sheffield J (2014) Global warming and changes in drought. Nat Clim Chang 4: 17–22. [Google Scholar]
  96. Vasey MC, Loik ME, Parker VT (2012) Influence of summer marine fog and low cloud stratus on water relations of evergreen woody shrubs (Arctostaphylos: Ericaceae) in the chaparral of Central California. Oecologia 170: 325–337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Venturas MD, MacKinnon ED, Dario HL, Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD (2016) Chaparral Shrub Hydraulic Traits, Size, and Life History Types Relate to Species Mortality during California’s Historic Drought of 2014. PLoS ONE 11: e0159145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Venturas MD, Sperry JS, Hacke UG (2017) Plant xylem hydraulics: what we understand, current research, and future challenges: plant xylem hydraulics. J Integr Plant Biol 59: 356–389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Weigelt P, Jetz W, Kreft H (2013) Bioclimatic and physical characterization of the world's islands. PNAS, 110(38), 15307–15312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Westoby M. (1999) Generalization in functional plant ecology: the species-sampling problem, plant ecology strategy schemes, and phylogeny In Pugnaire FI, Valladares F, eds, Handbook of Functional Plant Ecology. M. Dekker, New York, pp. 847–872. [Google Scholar]
  101. Westoby M, Cunningham SA, Fonseca CM, Overton JM, Wright IJ (1998) Phylogeny and variation in light capture area deployed per unit investment in leaves: designs for selecting study species with a view to generalizing In Lambers H, Poorter H, Vuuren MMI, eds, Inherent Variation in Plant Growth: Physiological Mechanisms and Eco-logical Consequences. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands, pp. 539–566. [Google Scholar]
  102. Williams AP, Still CJ, Fischer DT, Leavitt SW (2008b) The influence of summertime fog and overcast clouds on the growth of a coastal Californian pine: a tree-ring study. Oecologia 156: 601–611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Williams PA, Allen CD, Macalady AK, Griffin D, Woodhouse CA, Meko DM, Swetnam TW, Rauscher SA, Seager R, Grissino-Mayer HD et al. (2013) Temperature as a potent driver of regional forest drought stress and tree mortality. Nature Clim Change 3: 292–297. [Google Scholar]
  104. Williams SE, Shoo LP, Isaac JL, Hoffmann AA, Langham G (2008) Towards an Integrated Framework for Assessing the Vulnerability of Species to Climate Change. PLoS Biol 6: e325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Wilson CJ, Manos PS, Jackson RB (2008) Hydraulic traits are influenced by phylogenetic history in the drought-resistant, invasive genus Juniperus (Cupressaceae). Am J Bot 95: 299–314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

revised_coz115

Articles from Conservation Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES