Skip to main content
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics logoLink to Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
. 2018 Dec 4;15(3):755–760. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1547613

Development and evaluation of candidate subunit vaccine against botulinum neurotoxin serotype B

Dan-Yang Shi 1,*, Bo-Yang Chen 1,*, Yun-Yun Mao 1, Guo Zhou 1, Jian-Sheng Lu 1, Yun-Zhou Yu 1,, Xiao-Wei Zhou 1, Zhi-Wei Sun 1
PMCID: PMC6988880  PMID: 30433836

ABSTRACT

Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) are potential biological weapons because of their high toxicity and mortality. Vaccination is an effective strategy to prevent botulism. The carboxyl-terminus of the heavy chain (Hc domain) is nontoxic and sufficient to generate protective immune responses against natural BoNTs in animals. To produce a vaccine suitable for human use, a recombinant non His-tagged isoform of the Hc domain of botulinum neurotoxin serotype B (BHc) was expressed in Escherichia coli and purified by sequential chromatography. The immunogenicity of recombinant E.coli-expressed BHc and the yeast-expressed mBHc antigens was explored and compared in Balb/c mice. BHc provided comparable protective potency but elicited significantly higher antibody titer and neutralization potency against BoNT/B after twice immunization, indicating that the recombinant BHc protein expressed in E.coli have better immunogenicity than the yeast-expressed mBHc. Moreover, a frequency and dose-dependent effect was observed in mice immunized with BHc subunit vaccine and the anti-BHc ELISA antibody titers correlated well with neutralizing antibody titers and protection potency. In summary, the Alhydrogel-formulated BHc subunit vaccine afforded effective protection against BoNT/B challenge. Therefore, the non-His-tagged and homogeneous BHc expressed in E.coli represents a good potential candidate subunit vaccine for human use.

KEYWORDS: Botulinum neurotoxin, Hc domain, candidate subunit vaccine

Introduction

The botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs), which are mainly produced by the Gram-positive, anaerobic bacterium Clostridium botulinum, are the most toxic proteins.14 BoNTs can be divided into seven serotypes (BoNT/ABoNT/G), among which serotype A, B, E, and F are associated with human botulism.1,5,6 The BoNTs are structurally similar (150 kDa). Each BoNT consists of a heavy chain (HC, 100 kDa) and a N-terminal catalytic light chain (LC, 50 kDa) linked by a single disulfide bond.1,6,7 The carboxyl-terminus of the heavy chain (Hc) is responsible for neuro-specific binding to receptors on the peripheral nerve cell surface, and the amino-terminus of the heavy chain (HN) mediates translocation of the LC domain across the cell membrane.810 The LC of BoNT is a zinc-dependent metalloprotease that can cleave the SNARE protein and block neuromuscular transmission, resulting in skeletal muscle paralysis, respiratory failure, and eventually death.2,3,5,11,12

BoNT is a potential biological weapon because of its high toxicity and mortality. Vaccination is an effective strategy to prevent botulinum.5 The carboxyl-terminus of the HC (Hc domain) is nontoxic and sufficient to generate protective immune responses against natural BoNT in animals.1315 Therefore, a novel strategy for prevention of botulinum toxin poisoning based on nontoxic recombinant Hc domain of BoNT is developed.2,4 The recombinant Hc antigen can be synthesized in large quantities using yeast or Escherichia coli expression systems.1620 For vaccine development, E. coli offers additional advantages over Pichia pastoris, including cost-effectiveness and short production circle.16 Most importantly, the soluble recombinant Hc proteins of BoNTs produced by intracellular expression in E. coli are non-glycosylated and biologically similar with the native structure of BoNTs, which render them more immunogenicity.16,21

In this study, a prokaryotic expression vector encoding the nontoxic Hc domain of BoNT/B (BHc) was constructed and soluble recombinant BHc antigen was highly expressed in E. coli and purified by sequential chromatography. The immunogenicity and protective efficacy of recombinant BHc protein were evaluated and compared with the yeast expressed mBHc (removing its single potential glycosylation site BHcN957Q).21 Our results suggest that the recombinant BHc antigen provided comparable protective potency but elicited significantly higher ELISA antibody titer and neutralization potency against BoNT/B after twice immunization. Therefore, the non-His-tagged and homogeneous BHc expressed in E.coli represents a good potential candidate subunit vaccine for human use.

Results

Purification and analysis of recombinant BHc protein expressed in E. coli

The expression of recombinant BHc in E. coli (BL21) was visualized by SDS-PAGE as a major band of 50 kDa that demonstrated a high level of expression (Figure 1). Small-scale purification of non His-tagged BHc was carried out using sequential chromatography. SDS–PAGE analysis of the BHc product showed approximately 95% purity after two steps (Figure 1, lane 4) and the product (50 kDa) was identified by Western blot analysis (Figure 1, lane 5). Final product yields ranged from 15 to 20 mg of purified protein per liter of culture.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Analysis of purified recombinant BHc protein during various purification steps by SDS-PAGE and western bolt. The soluble fraction and purified BHc were subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis using hyperimmune anti-neurotoxin B serum. Lane 1, pTIG-Trx vector transformed cell lysates; Lane 2, pTIG-Trx-BHc transformed BL21 cell lysates; Lane 3, MMC column purified products; Lane 4, Source 30s column purified products; Lane 5, Western blot analysis; M, protein markers 180, 130, 95, 72(red), 55, 43, 34, 26 and 17 KDa (from top to bottom); An arrow indicates the position of the BHc.

Immunogenicity of recombinant E.coli-expressed BHc and yeast-expressed mBHc antigens

In a previous study, a mBHc protein prepared in yeast was immunologically active and could confer effective protective immunity.21 In this study, we evaluated and compared the immunogenicity of recombinant E.coli-expressed BHc and yeast-expressed mBHc antigens in Balb/c mice. Mice were vaccinated i.m. once or twice using two different doses of BHc, and mBHc formulated with aluminum hydroxide adjuvant. As shown in Table 1, a dose-dependent immune response to the BHc antigen was observed and anti-BHc ELISA antibody titer correlated well with protective potency against BoNT/B. Mice with single BHc vaccination had relatively low (3.08–3.11) geometric mean titers (GMT) and can be protected against 1000 LD50 of BoNT/B. After once boost immunizations, the group GMT was obviously increased (4.28–4.81) and those mice can be protected completely against 10,000 LD50 of BoNT/B.

Table 1.

Survival, group antibody ELISA titers, and serum neutralization titers of mice after vaccination with BHc and mBHC antigens.

  Number alive a
Number alive b
Log10 GMT(SD) c
Serum neutralization titer(IU/ml) d
Vaccination dose 1e 2e 2e 1e 2e 2e
1μg of BHc 5 5 5 3.22(0.05) 4.90(0.05)* 0.8
10μg of BHc 5 5 5 3.40(0.16) 5.04(0.08)* 2.33
1μg of mBHc 5 5 5 3.17(0.25) 4.37(0.07) 0.73
10μg of mBHc 5 5 5 3.07(0.02) 4.56(0.21) 1.25
Control 0 0 0 < 2 < 2 < 0.125

aMice alive (5 mice/group) after i.p. challenge with a dose 1000 LD50 of BoNT/B 3 weeks after last injection.

bMice alive (5 mice/group) after i.p. challenge with a dose 10,000 LD50 of BoNT/B 3 weeks after last injection.

cSera obtained 2 days before challenge from individual mice was assayed and their mean was used to calculate the Log10 GMT for each group. Standard deviations (SD) of the geometric mean titer (GMT) are in parenthesis.

dPolled sera from each group of mice were diluted and assayed for serum neutralization titers. Serum form each group were pooled due to the limited amount of serum available from each mouse. The results represent the average neutralization titers of each group.

eNumber of vaccinations. Mice were vaccinated either once or twice of two different dosages of BHc or mBHc.

*P < 0.05, compared to mBHc-immunized group.

Compared with mBHc, BHc provided comparable protective potency but elicited significantly higher ELISA and neutralization antibody titer (P < 0.05) against BoNT/B after twice immunization. These results indicates that the recombinant BHc protein expressed in E.coli have better immunogenicity than the yeast-expressed mBHc.

Efficacy of BHc subunit vaccine against BoNT/B in mice

To further confirm the potency of the BHc subunit vaccine, we performed another efficacy study against BoNT/B. Mice were immunized i.m. once or twice with 0.0039, 0.0156, 0.0625, 0.25, 1 or 4 μg of recombinant BHc antigen formulated with aluminum hydroxide adjuvant and challenged with various doses of BoNT/B. A dose-dependent protective potency against BoNT/B was observed. Mice immunized with one injection of ≥ 1 μg BHc antigen or two injections of ≥ 0.0625 μg BHc antigen were completely protected against 1000 LD50 or 10,000LD50 of BoNT/B, respectively (Table 2 and Figure 2). The mouse potency bioassay was subjected to probit analysis to determine the ED50, or theoretical antigen dose that will protect 50% of the mice from lethal injection. The calculated ED50 for this potency assay was 0.244 μg with single dose or 0.013 μg with two doses.

Table 2.

Survival, group antibody ELISA titers, and serum neutralization titers of mice after vaccination with BHc vaccine.

  Number alive a
Number alive b
Log10 GMT(SD) c
Serum neutralization titer (IU/ml) d
Vaccination dose 1e 2e 1e 2e 2e
0 (Control) 0 0 < 2 < 2 < 0.125
0.0039 μg 0 0 2.49(0.16) 2.71(0.26) < 0.125
0.0156 μg 0 4 2.39(0.07) 2.87(0.19) < 0.125
0.0625 μg 0 5 2.46(0.12) 3.45(0.35) 0.25
0.25 μg 3 5 3.14(0.04) 3.83(0.06) 0.83
1 μg 5 5 3.17(0.01) 4.28(0.08) 1.33
4 μg 5 5 3.20(0.05) 4.56(0.16) 2.66

aMice alive (5 mice/group) after i.p. challenge with a dose 1000 LD50 of BoNT/B 3 weeks after last injection.

bMice alive (5 mice/group) after i.p. challenge with a dose 10,000 LD50 of BoNT/B 3 weeks after last injection.

cSera obtained 2 days before challenge from individual mice was assayed and their mean was used to calculate the Log10 GMT for each group. Standard deviations (SD) of the geometric mean titer (GMT) are in parenthesis.

dPolled sera from each group of mice were diluted and assayed for serum neutralization titers. Serum form each group were pooled due to the limited amount of serum available from each mouse. The results represent the average neutralization titers of each group.

eNumber of vaccinations. Mice were vaccinated either once or twice of BHc range from 0.0039 μg to 4 μg formulated with aluminum hydroxide adjuvant.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Survival of mice immunized with BHc vaccine. Mice alive after challenge with a dose of 1000 LD50 of BoNT/B 3 weeks after one injection or 10,000LD50 of BoNT/B 3 weeks after two injections.

A dose-dependent anti-BHc ELISA and neutralization antibody response was also observed in mice immunized with the BHc subunit vaccine (Table 2 and Figure 3). And the anti-BHc ELISA and neutralization antibody titers correlated well with protective potency against BoNT/B. In summary, the recombinant BHc antigen formulated with aluminum hydroxide adjuvant afforded effective protection against neurotoxin challenge in Balb/c mice, indicating that this BHc protein has a functionally active conformation and can be used as a subunit candidate vaccine against BoNT/B.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Anti-BHc antibody titers in mice vaccinated with one or two doses of BHc formulated with aluminum hydroxide adjuvant. Mice were immunized one or two doses with 0.039 μg to 4 μg of BHc formulated with aluminum hydroxide adjuvant. Sera form individual mice from each group (n = 5) three weeks after final immunization were collected and specific antibody titer were analyzed by ELISA. Serum sample from individual mice sere assayed and the geometric mean titer (GMT) was calculated for each group.

Discussion

BoNTs are the most toxic proteins, which can result in human botulism. Vaccination is an effective strategy to prevent botulism.5 The Hc domain of BoNTs is nontoxic and carry most of the neutralizing epitopes, making it sufficient to generate protective immune responses against natural BoNT in animal models.1315

In this study, we presented the production and evaluation of a recombinant Hc subunit vaccine as a candidate subunit vaccine for human use in the prevention of botulism serotype B. A prokaryotic expression vector encoding the nontoxic Hc domain of BoNT/B (BHc) was constructed and soluble recombinant BHc antigen was highly expressed in E. coli and purified by sequential chromatography.

The potency study indicated that the E.coli-expressed BHc have good immunogenicity and is efficacious in eliciting protective antibody against natural BoNT/B. We showed that 1μg of BHc can elicit strong immune response and protect the mice against 1000 LD50 dose of active BoNT/B after one injection and 10,000 LD50 dose after two injections, which is comparable with mBHc. However, BHc can elicit significantly higher antibody titer (P < 0.05) against BoNT/B after twice immunization compare with mBHc. Notably, recombinant glycosylated secreted wild BHc products were immunologically inert and could not confer protection against BoNT/B.21 The mBHc was a non-glycosylated secreted homogeneous BHc isoform, which was successfully prepared in yeast after deleting the pro-peptide and removing its single potential glycosylation site (BHcN957Q).

To further conform the potency of the BHc subunit vaccine, a dose-dependent efficacy study was carried out in mice. The results showed that E.coli-expressed BHc can protect mice against high-dose BoNT/B challenge with low injection dosage. The immunization dosage ranged from 0.0039 μg to 4 μg by four-fold. High protective efficacy was produced in mice immunized with one injection of ≥ 1 μg BHc antigen or two injections of ≥ 0.0625 μg BHc antigen. And the group GMT correlated well with group neutralizing antibody titers and protective potency. Our results suggest that the recombinant BHc expressed in E.coli is biologically active and potent to be used as a subunit candidate vaccine against BoNT/B.

Extensive studies aimed to produce recombinant Hc of BoNTs were performed in different expression systems, among which E.coli and yeast were the systems mostly used. Previously, the recombinant BHc expressed in E.coli was insoluble in the form of inclusion bodies.2224 Meanwhile, yeast expressed BHc protein was glycosylated and fail to elicit protective immunity as reported.22 So we developed a non-glycosylated secreted mBHc protein in yeast that was immunologically active and can confer effective protective immunity.21 Yeast expression system can promote the expression quantity and ease the purification process by secretory express. However, for vaccine development, E.coli offers additional advantages over Pichia pastoris, including cost-effectiveness and short production circle. Most importantly, the soluble recombinant Hc proteins of BoNT produced by intracellular expression in E. coli are non-glycosylated and biologically similar with the native structure of BoNTs, which render them more immunogenic.

Thus, in this study, we constructed a pTIG-Trx-BHc expression vector using the BamH I and Xho I restriction sites, and obtained fully soluble expression of recombinant BHc in E.coli.25 The successfully soluble expression of BHc is largely owe to the pTIG-Trx expression vector. Because expression of the same synthetic BHc gene into soluble protein failed in other vectors in our lab and the form of inclusion bodies was biologically inactive. And the pTIG-Trx-BHc vector can express thioredoxin (Trx) together with BHc, which can help BHc protein to fold correctly and be expressed in a soluble form as previously reported.26

In summary, we successfully expressed and purified a non-His-tagged homogeneous BHc in E.coli and studied its immunogenicity in mice, compared with a non-glycosylated mBHc expressed in yeast.21 Our results showed that BHc was immunological active and provided comparable protective potency to mBHc, but BHc elicited higher antibody titers and neutralization potency against BoNT/B than mBHc after two immunizations. Therefore, the non-His-tagged homogeneous BHc expressed in E.coli represents a good potential candidate subunit vaccine for human use. We further need to determine the immunological and biological activity of BHc expressed in E.coli in the next study. And the efficacy of the BHc subunit vaccine in various animal models will be further characterized for preclinical studies.

Materials and methods

Constructions of expression vector

To produce recombinant non His-tagged BHc antigen in E. coli, a prokaryotic expression vector pTIG-Trx-BHc was constructed in this study. In brief, the BHc gene encoding the Hc domain of BoNT/B (BHc, amino acids 853–1291, ~ 50 kDa) was amplified by PCR from pABE293SBHc vector with primer pairs CATGG GATCC TTCAA CAAAT ACAAC TCCGA AATCT TAAAC and CATGC TCGAG GGAAC CTCAC TCGGT CCAAC CCTC.27 The BHc gene was cloned into the pTIG-Trx expression vector (an optical prokaryotic expression vector maintained in our lab) using the BamH I and Xho I restriction sites,25 which resulted in the recombinant plasmid pTIG-Trx-BHc confirmed by sequencing.

Expression and purification of recombinant BHc protein

The recombinant plasmid pTIG-Trx-BHc was prepared using Endofree Mega-Q kits (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and subsequently transformed into E. coli strain BL21 (DE3) (TRANSGEN BIOTECH, Beijing, China). The single colonies were cultured at 37°C in 2× YT (1.6 %Tryptone, 1 % Yeast extract, 0.5 % NaCl) medium containing 100 μg/ml ampicillin until the OD600 reach 0.6–1.0. Isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG, Promega, Madison, WI, USA) was added to the medium at a final concentration of 0.2 mM, the cultures were induced at 16°C overnight. The bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation (8000 rpm, 20 min, 4°C), and the expression products were analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The cells were suspended in lysis buffer (100 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6.0) and lysed by ultrasonic homogenizer. The supernatant was cleared by centrifugation and used for further purification of the BHc product.

The supernatants containing the non-His-tagged BHc product were purified using sequential cation exchange chromatography. All chromatography steps were performed on an AKTA Explorer (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA). Briefly, a CaptoTM MMC column (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA) was used for the first purification step. The column was equilibrated with buffer A (20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6.0). Next, the column was equilibrated with 1 M NaCl in buffer A and then loaded with the supernatants. The BHc protein was eluted with 100 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.5). A Source 30S column (GE Healthcare) was used for the second purification step. The column was equilibrated with buffer A and then loaded with previously eluted pooled solutions. The BHc protein was eluted with 200 mM NaCl in buffer A. Finally, the eluate containing BHc protein was desalted to phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4). The purified BHc protein was verified by 10% SDS-PAGE and Western blot using hyper-immune horse BoNT/B antiserum.

Immunization of mice and challenge with BoNT/B

Specific pathogen-free female Balb/c mice (Beijing Laboratory Animal Center, Beijing, China) at 6–8 weeks of age were randomly assigned to different treatment groups (10 mice per group). Mice were intramuscularly (i.m.) injected with 1 μg or 10 μg of recombinant BHc antigen or mBHc in 100 μl PBS (pH 7.4) containing 0.2% (w/w) alhydrogel (Aluminum hydroxide gel, Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). As a negative control, PBS instead of the antigen was formulated with the alhydrogel. The same method and amounts of BHc antigens were used for boosting immunization at 3-week intervals. To further assess the immune protective response against BoNT/B, 5 mice of each group were i.m. injected with 0.0039, 0.0156, 0.0625, 0.25, 1 or 4 μg recombinant BHc antigen one or two doses, respectively.

Three weeks after the first or second vaccination, the mice of different treatment groups were challenged with an active preparation containing 103 or 104 50% lethal doses (LD50) of BoNT/B by i.p. injection, and survival was monitored for 7 days. All animal procedures were conducted with the approval of the Beijing Institute of Biotechnology Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and were in full compliance with the Committee’s guidelines.

Serum antibody titer measurement

To assess BHc-specific antibody responses of immunized mice, serum samples were collected at 3 weeks after each immunization and stored at −20°C before assaying. ELISA plates (Corning, NY, USA) were coated overnight at 4°C with purified recombinant BHc (0.2 μg/well). The plates were washed six times with PBS-T (PBS, 0.05% Tween-20) and blocked with PBS containing 2% albumin bovine V (BBI Life Sciences, Shanghai, China). The mouse serum samples were two-fold serially diluted in blocking buffer starting at the 1:100 dilutions, and plates were incubated with serum diluents (100 μl/well) for 1.5 h at 37°C. After washing with PBS-T six times, the total IgG titers and the individual isotype of IgG were measured using 1:2000 dilution of HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Jackson Immunoresearch, Lancaster, PA, USA; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) for 30 min at 37°C. After washing, the plates were incubated with 50 μl of a substrate solution containing 0.04 % o-phenylenediamine (OPD, w/v) and 0.02 % H2O2 (v/v) in citrate-phosphate buffer (pH5.0) for 10 min at room temperature. The reaction was stopped with 2 M H2SO4 (50 μl/well), and the plates were read with a SpectraMax 190 microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Antibody titers were estimated as the reciprocal of the maximum dilution where the absorbance of the serum greater than 0.3 units, after subtraction of non-specific binding detected in control serum. Serum antibody titers of individual mice was assayed and the geometric mean titer (GMT) for each group was determined.

BoNT/B neutralization assay

The neutralization potency of the sera from mice vaccinated with two doses of recombinant BHc or mBHc was measured using a BoNT/B neutralization assay as described previously.28 Serially diluted anti-BoNT/B sera collected from immunized mice mixed with a standard concentration of BoNT/B (100 LD50/ml) were incubated 15 min at 37°C. Mice (18–22 g) were intraperitoneally (i.p.) injected with the mixtures in a total volume of 0.5 ml/mouse (four mice in each group). The mice were monitored for 7 days, and the survival was recorded. The neutralizing antibody titers in the sera were calculated as international units per milliliter (IU/ml) according to a WHO (World Health Organization) BoNT/B antitoxin.

Statistical analysis

Differences in the antibody immune responses were analyzed statistically by ANOVA one-way variance test or using the Student’s t-test for the analysis of differences between groups. Fisher’s exact test was used to determine statistical differences in survival between the treatment groups. For all tests only data resulting in P values < 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant. Fifty percent effective concentrations (ED50) were determined by probit analysis at the 95% confidence level with SAS (version 6.10; SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.).

Funding Statement

This work was supported by grants from the Special Key Project of Biosafety Technologies (2017YFC1200902) for the National Major Research and Development Program of China. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

The authors declare no financial or commercial conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Dembek ZF, Smith LA, Rusnak JM.. 2007. Botulism: cause, effects, diagnosis, clinical and laboratory identification, and treatment modalities. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 1:122–134. doi: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e318158c5fd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Smith LA, Rusnak JM. Botulinum neurotoxin vaccines: past, present, and future. Crit Rev Immunol. 27;2007:303–318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schiavo G, Matteoli M, Montecucco C. 2000. Neurotoxins affecting neuroexocytosis. Physiol Rev. 80:717–766. doi: 10.1152/physrev.2000.80.2.717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yu YZ, Zhang SM, Ma Y, Zhu HQ, Wang WB, Du Y, Zhou XW, Wang RL, Wang S, Yu WY, et al. 2010. Development and evaluation of candidate vaccine and antitoxin against botulinum neurotoxin serotype F. Clin Immunol. 137:271–280. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2010.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shukla HD, Sharma SK. 2005. Clostridium botulinum: a bug with beauty and weapon. Crit Rev Microbiol. 31:11–18. doi: 10.1080/10408410590912952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Turton K, Chaddock JA, Acharya KR. 2002. Botulinum and tetanus neurotoxins: structure, function and therapeutic utility. Trends Biochem Sci. 27:552–558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Swaminathan S, Eswaramoorthy S. 2000. Structural analysis of the catalytic and binding sites of Clostridium botulinum neurotoxin B. Nat Struct Biol. 7:693–699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Schiavo G, Rossetto O, Santucci A, DasGupta BR, Montecucco C. 1992. Botulinum neurotoxins are zinc proteins. J Biol Chem. 267:23479–23483. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gu S, Jin R. 2013. Assembly and function of the botulinum neurotoxin progenitor complex. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 364:21–44. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-33570-9_2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lee K, Gu S, Jin L, Le TTN, Cheng LW, Strotmeier J, Kruel AM, Yao G, Perry K, Rummel A, et al. 2013. Structure of a bimodular botulinum neurotoxin complex provides insights into its oral toxicity. Plos Pathogens. 9:e1003690. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Matak I, Lackovic Z. 2014. Botulinum toxin A, brain and pain. Prog Neurobiol. 119-120:39–59. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2014.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Inglesby TV, Schechter R, Inglesby TV, Henderson DA, Bartlett JG, Ascher MS, Eitzen E, Fine AD, Hauer J, Layton M, et al 2001. Botulinum toxin as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. Jama. 285:1059–1070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Karalewitz AP, Barbieri JT. 2012. Vaccines against botulism. Curr Opin Microbiol. 15:317–324. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2012.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Smith LA. Botulism and vaccines for its prevention. Vaccine. 2009;27(Suppl 4):D33–9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.08.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Atassi MZ. 2004. Basic immunological aspects of botulinum toxin therapy. Mov Disord. 19:S68–S84. doi: 10.1002/mds.20020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Moreira GM, Cunha CE, Salvarani FM, Goncalves LA, Pires PS, Conceicao FR, Lobato FCF. 2014. Production of recombinant botulism antigens: a review of expression systems. Anaerobe. 28:130–136. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2014.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Byrne MP, Smith TJ, Montgomery VA, Smith LA. 1998. Purification, potency, and efficacy of the botulinum neurotoxin type A binding domain from Pichia pastoris as a recombinant vaccine candidate. Infect Immun. 66:4817–4822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gurkan C, Ellar DJ. 2005. Recombinant production of bacterial toxins and their derivatives in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris. Microb Cell Fact. 4:1–8. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-4-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yu YZ, Li N, Wang RL, Zhu HQ, Wang S, Yu WY, Sun ZW. 2008. Evaluation of a recombinant Hc of clostridium botulinum neurotoxin serotype F as an effective subunit vaccine. Clin Vaccine Immunol Cvi. 15:1819. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00239-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Holley JL, Elmore M, Mauchline M, Minton N, Titball RW. 2000. Cloning, expression and evaluation of a recombinant sub-unit vaccine against clostridium botulinum type F toxin. Vaccine. 19:288–297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Liu B, Shi D, Chang S, Gong X, Yu Y, Sun Z, Wu J. 2015. Characterization and immunological activity of different forms of recombinant secreted Hc of botulinum neurotoxin serotype B products expressed in yeast. Sci Rep. 5:7678. doi: 10.1038/srep07678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Byrne MP, Smith LA. 2000. Development of vaccines for prevention of botulism. Biochimie. 82:955–966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gao YL, Gao S, Kang L, Nie C, Wang JL. 2010. Expression of Hc fragment from Clostridium botulinum neurotoxin serotype B in Escherichia coli and its use as a good immunogen. Hum Vaccin. 6:462–466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhou Y, Singh BR. 2004. Cloning, high-level expression, single-step purification, and binding activity of His6-tagged recombinant type B botulinum neurotoxin heavy chain transmembrane and binding domain. Protein Expr Purif. 34:8–16. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2003.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yu YZ, Na L, Zhu HQ, Wang RL, Yun D, Shuang W, Yu WY, Sun ZW. 2009. The recombinant Hc subunit of Clostridium botulinum neurotoxin serotype A is an effective botulism vaccine candidate. Vaccine. 27:2816–2822. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.02.091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yu YZ, Gong ZW, Ma Y, Zhang SM, Zhu HQ, Wang WB, Du Y, Wang S, Yu WY, Sun ZW. 2011. Co-expression of tetanus toxin fragment C in Escherichia coli with thioredoxin and its evaluation as an effective subunit vaccine candidate. Vaccine. 29:5978–5985. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.06.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yu YZ, Shi DY, Liu S, Gong ZW, Wang S, Sun ZW. 2015. Production and evaluation of a recombinant subunit vaccine against botulinum neurotoxin serotype B using a 293E expression system. Hum Vaccin. 11:468–473. doi: 10.4161/hv.29714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yu YZ, Wang WB, Li N, Wang S, Yu WY, Sun ZW. 2010. Enhanced potency of individual and bivalent DNA replicon vaccines or conventional DNA vaccines by formulation with aluminum phosphate. Biologicals. 38:658–663. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2010.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES