Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Transplant. 2019 Mar 28;19(8):2262–2273. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15326

Table 3.

Most significantly associated polygenic risk scores with eGFR post-transplant

D/R pT eGFR Estimate SE Pun Padj I2 N N SNPs
combined 0.0001 1year 0.011 0.003 4.35×10−5 0.001 0.0% 3234 6229
recipient 0.0001 1year 0.008 0.002 8.68×10−5 0.005 6.2% 5295 6229
donor 0.0001 1year 0.006 0.003 0.01 0.755 2.7% 3564 6229
donor 0.1 5year 0.011 0.005 0.05 1 35.0% 2152 287016
recipient 0.0001 5year 0.008 0.004 0.06 1 0.0% 2494 6229
combined 0.0001 5year 0.008 0.005 0.11 1 0.0% 1930 6229
recipient 0.0001 0.668 0.367 0.07 1 0.0% 2191 6229
donor 0.001 -0.348 0.358 0.33 1 0.0% 1904 14097
combined 0.001 -0.513 0.413 0.21 1 0.0% 1722 14097

Meta-analysis results for linear regression of polygenic risk scores vs. eGFR measures. 1/5 year = log10 eGFR at 1/5 year post-transplant. ∆ = change in eGFR between 1 and 5 years post-transplant. Model was adjusted for all available significant clinical covariates and the first eight principal components at each site (see section 2.5 and 3.1). D/R = indicates whether the test was carried out on the recipient, donor or combined donor-recipient genotype. pT = p-value threshold of the calculated polygenic risk score. Estimate = estimated effect size. SE = standard error of the estimate. Pun = uncorrected p-value. Padj=approximate adjusted p-value. I² = the proportion of total variation in study estimates that is due to heterogeneity. N = number of individuals tested. N SNPs = number of SNPs at the given p-value threshold (prior to pruning for linkage disequilibrium).