Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 23;10:1375. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01375

Table 3.

Meta-analysis of the effects of SOX2-OT overexpression on survival and clinical parameters.

Outcome No. of trials (patients) HR or RR(95% CI) P value of Fixed-effect Model Z value of Fixed-effect Model HR or RR(95% CI) P value of Random-effect Model Z value of Random-effect Model Heterogeneity I2(%), P value P value of Egger’s test, Begg’s test
Fixed-Effect estimate Random-Effect estimate
OS 11 (1029) 2.026 (1.691–2.428) <0.0001 7.6500 2.026 (1.691–2.428) <0.0001 7.6500 0.0%, 0.9698 0.0135, 0.0158
DFS 2 (241) 2.332 (1.593–3.413) <0.0001 4.3575 2.554 (1.261–5.174) 0.0092 2.6045 66.6%, 0.0836 NA, NA
Tumor stage (III/IV versus I/II) 9 (784) 1.526 (1.325–1.758) <0.0001 5.8585 1.468 (1.106–1.949) 0.0079 2.6566 71.9%, 0.0004 0.8772, 0.8348
Lymphatic metastasis (yes versus no) 7 (631) 1.534 (1.311–1.794) <0.0001 5.3453 1.554 (1.211–1.994) 0.0005 3.4685 52.2%, 0.0508 0.4831, 0.8806
Distant metastasis (yes versus no) 4 (486) 3.054 (1.866–4.999) <0.0001 4.4415 2.957 (1.620–5.400) 0.0004 3.5295 18.3%, 0.2989 0.1705, 0.1742
Tumor size (large versus small) 7 (667) 1.285 (1.118–1.478) 0.0004 3.5306 1.264 (1.019–1.566) 0.0329 2.1336 56.2%, 0.0330 0.3387, 0.2931
Depth of tumor invasion (T3/4 versus T1/2) 3 (369) 1.552 (1.274–1.890) <0.0001 4.3703 1.557 (1.280–1.894) <0.0001 4.4300 0.0%, 0.9288 0.5396, 0.6015
Differentiation (poor/moderate versus well) 9 (834) 1.131 (0.978–1.309) 0.0977 1.6560 1.122 (0.800–1.573) 0.5062 0.6647 78.7%, <0.0001 0.5987, 0.2971
Age (elder versus young) 10 (929) 0.981 (0.862–1.116) 0.7661 -0.2975 0.966 (0.821–1.138) 0.6812 -0.4108 31.4%, 0.1575 0.1080, 0.3970
Gender (male versus female) 8 (796) 1.022 (0.921–1.134) 0.6798 0.4128 1.013 (0.916–1.122) 0.7959 0.2587 0.0%, 0.8005 0.5557, 0.3223

HR, hazard ratio; RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval; OS, overall survival; DFS, disease-free survival; NA, not available.

I2, index for assessing heterogeneity; value ≥25% indicates a moderate to high heterogeneity.

Egger’s test: P value of Egger’s regression for asymmetry assessment.

Begg’s test: P value of Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation test for asymmetry assessment.

Bold italics indicate statistically significant values (P < 0.05).