Table 6.
AUC and AP performance of different methods on link prediction.
Method | Cora | Citeseer | Pubmed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUC | AP | AUC | AP | AUC | AP | |
GAE | 0.910 | 0.920 | 0.895 | 0.899 | 0.964 | 0.965 |
VGAE | 0.914 | 0.926 | 0.908 | 0.920 | 0.944 | 0.947 |
LoNGAE | 0.896 | 0.915 | 0.860 | 0.892 | 0.926 | 0.930 |
αLoNGAE | 0.943 | 0.952 | 0.956 | 0.964 | 0.960 | 0.963 |
GCN | 0.809 | 0.811 | 0.811 | 0.822 | 0.828 | 0.834 |
MT-GAT (ours) | 0.930 | 0.963 | 0.931 | 0.963 | 0.968 | 0.970 |
The best results are shown in bold.