Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 7;267(2):522–530. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09605-5

Table 4.

Bivariate and multivariate analysis of primary endpoint (recurrent ipsilateral ischemic stroke or retinal artery occlusion) with Cox regression

Bivariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR (95% CI) p value HR (95% CI) p value
Conventional ≥ 50% stenosis 1.0 Ref 1.0 Ref
Near-occlusion without full collapse 1.5 (0.7–3.4) 0.28 2.0 (0.9–4.5) 0.09
Near-occlusion with full collapse 2.7 (1.4–5.4) 0.005 2.6 (1.3–5.3) 0.006
Age (10-year increment) 1.1 (0.8–1.6) 0.49 1.2 (0.9–1.8) 0.26
Male sex 0.9 (0.5–1.6) 0.66 Not used
Previous myocardial infarction 1.1 (0.5–2.2) 0.78 Not used
Current angina 1.4 (0.7–2.8) 0.41 Not used
Heart failure 0.9 (0.3–2.8) 0.81 Not used
Current intermittent claudication 1.2 (0.4–3.4) 0.71 Not used
Previous arterial revascularization 1.4 (0.7–2.8) 0.28 Not used
Atrial fibrillation 1.8 (0.8–3.8) 0.14 Not used
Current smoking 0.8 (0.4–1.8) 0.64 Not used
Diabetes 0.7 (0.4–1.5) 0.41 Not used
Hypertension 2.6 (0.6–10.8) 0.18 2.6 (0.6–11.0) 0.19
Previous stroke 1.0 (0.5–2.3) 0.98 Not used
Ipsilateral event < 14 days before presenting event 0.7 (0.3–1.6) 0.41 0.8 (0.3–2.0) 0.69
Cerebrala presenting event 7.8 (1.1–56.4) 0.04 7.0 (0.96–51.5) 0.06
Sought health care at other hospital 0.9 (0.5–1.8) 0.85 Not used

All co-variates with p < 0.1 in bivariate analysis or in baseline analysis used in the multivariate model

HR hazard ratio

aStroke and TIA merged to “cerebral” event, compared to amaurosis fugax and retinal artery occlusion merged to “retinal” event: stroke and TIA had similar high risk of primary endpoint (p = 0.82), whereas only one case with retinal artery occlusion and none with amaurosis fugax reached the primary endpoint