Table 3.
Logistic regression analyses predicting treatment progress at 6-month follow-up by motivational and control processes during the baseline test-session.
| Treatment progress (0 = no; 1 = yes) at 6-month follow-up (n = 44) |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 |
Model 2 |
Model 3 |
|||||||
| B | Exp (B) | 95% CI | B | Exp (B) | 95% CI | B | Exp (B) | 95% CI | |
| Constant | 3.16** | – | – | 3.80** | – | – | 5.13* | – | – |
| CUDIT baseline | −0.10* | 0.90 | 0.82–0.99 | −0.10† | 0.91 | 0.82–1.00 | −0.09† | 0.90 | 0.83–1.01 |
| Cannabis attentional bias | 0.11 | 1.12 | 0.95–1.31 | 0.11 | 1.12 | 0.95–1.31 | |||
| Cannabis approach bias | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.99–1.01 | 0.02 | 1.00 | 0.99–101 | |||
| Appetitive approach bias | −0.01 | 0.99 | 0.98–1.00 | −0.01 | 0.99 | 0.98–1.00 | |||
| Cannabis craving | −0.23† | 0.79 | 0.60–1.04 | −0.26† | 0.77 | 0.58–1.02 | |||
| Classical Stroop | −0.04 | 0.96 | 0.90–1.03 | ||||||
| Model chi-square [df] | 5.89* [1] | 12.88* [5] | 14.08* [6] | ||||||
| Block chi-square [df] | 5.89* [1] | 6.00 [4] | 1.20 [1] | ||||||
| % Correct predictions | 77.3 | 75.0 | 79.5 | ||||||
| Nagelkerke R2 | 0.18 | 0.36 | 0.38 | ||||||
**
p < 0.01.
*
p < 0.05.
†
p < 0.10.