Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec;7(23):720. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.12.18

Table 2. The risk of bias of enrolled studies.

Bias Authors judgment Evidence for judgement
Besarab 2015
   Random sequence generation Low risk Treatment was assigned according to a randomization code provided by the statistical contract research organization
   Allocation concealment Low risk Study drugs were not dispensed in containers identifiable by subject as containing active or placebo capsules
   Blinding of participants and personnel High risk The study was single-blinded. Drugs were administered to subjects in a manner that did not reveal treatment assignment to the subjects
   Blinding of outcome assessment High risk The study was single-blinded, and the dose varied during the study
   Incomplete outcome data Low risk The details of incomplete outcome have been stated
   Selective reporting Low risk All parameters have been reported
   Other bias High risk The study was supported by pharmaceutical company
Chen 2017
   Random sequence generation Unclear risk Not reported
   Allocation concealment Unclear risk Not reported
   Blinding of participants and personnel Low risk The study was a double-blinded trial, and no breaking of randomization was reported
   Blinding of outcome assessment Unclear risk Not reported
   Incomplete outcome data Low risks Five patients withdrew consent. Three patients dropped out because of adverse events. Two patients lacked of efficacy were excluded
   Selective reporting Low risk All collected parameters have been reported
   Other bias High risk The study was supported by pharmaceutical company
Akizawa 2019
   Random sequence generation Unclear risk It is unclear how were the random sequence generated
   Allocation concealment Low risk Dynamic allocation was conducted using a biased-coin minimization approach
   Blinding of participants and personnel Low risk The study was double-blinded, and no breaking of randomization was reported
   Blinding of outcome assessment Unclear risk Not reported
   Incomplete outcome data Low risk All dropped-out patients have been reported
   Selective reporting Low risk All the results were reported
   Other bias High risk The study was supported by pharmaceutical company