Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci Methods. 2019 Dec 9;332:108547. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.108547

Table 5.

ROC curve analysis determined between MCI and HC, adjusted for age and sex.

MCI vs HC

Prev. 5 %
Prev. 10 %
Prev. 16 %
Prev. 20 %
Prev. 36.7 %
Sensitivity Specificity Cut-off AUC, p PPV NPV PPV NPV PPV NPV PPV NPV PPV NPV
Ego 1st attempt Error 93.9 % 80.7 % 0.2519 0.917, p < 0.001* 20.3 % 99.6 % 35 % 99.1 % 48 % 98.5 % 54.8 % 98.1 % 73.8 % 95.6 %
Time 96.9 % 78.4 % 0.2466 0.900, p < 0.001* 19.1 % 99.8 % 33.3 % 99.6 % 46.1 % 99.3 % 52.9 % 99 % 72.2 % 87.9 %
Ego average of last 4 attempts Error 87.9 % 83 % 0.3153 0.901, p < 0.001* 21.4 % 99.2 % 36.5 % 98.4 % 49.6 % 97.3 % 56.4 % 96.5 % 75 % 92.2 %
Time 100 % 71.6 % 0.1511 0.899, p < 0.001* 15.6 % 100 % 28.1 % 100 % 40.1 % 100 % 46.8 % 100 % 67.1 % 100 %
Ego average of all 8 attempts Error 93.9 % 76.1 % 0.1956 0.915, p < 0.001* 17.1 % 99.6 % 30.4 % 99.1 % 42.8 % 98.5 % 49.6 % 98 % 69.5 % 95.6 %
Time 100 % 73.9 % 0.2053 0.888, p < 0.001* 16.8 % 100 % 29.9 % 100 % 42.2 % 100 % 48.9 % 100 % 69 % 100 %
Allo 1st attempt Error 100 % 72.7 % 0.1951 0.887, p < 0.001* 16.2 % 100 % 28.9 % 100 % 41.1 % 100 % 47.8 % 100 % 68 % 100 %
Time 100 % 75 % 0.2109 0.895, p < 0.001* 17.4 % 100 % 30.8 % 100 % 43.2 % 100 % 50 % 100 % 69.9 % 100 %
Allo average of last 4 attempts Error 100 % 70.5 % 0.1707 0.879, p < 0.001* 15.1 % 100 % 27.4 % 100 % 39.2 % 100 % 45.9 % 100 % 63.3 % 100 %
Time 100 % 70.5 % 0.2059 0.892, p < 0.001* 15.1 % 100 % 27.4 % 100 % 39.2 % 100 % 45.9 % 100 % 66.3 % 100 %
Allo average of all 8 attempts Error 100 % 71.6 % 0.1642 0.896, p < 0.001* 15.6 % 100 % 28.1 % 100 % 40.1 % 100 % 46.8 % 100 % 67.1 % 100 %
Time 100 % 73.9 % 0.1831 0.890, p < 0.001* 16.8 % 100 % 29.9 % 100 % 42.2 % 100 % 48.9 % 100 % 69 % 100 %
Combined Allo-Ego 1st attempt Error 90.9 % 80.7 % 0.2294 0.920, p < 0.001* 15.5 % 99.4 % 34.4 % 98.8 % 47.3 % 97.9 % 54.1 % 97.3 % 73.2 % 93.9 %
Time 96.9 % 77.3 % 0.2367 0.886, p < 0.001* 18.3 % 99.8 % 32.2 % 99.6 % 44.8 % 99.2 % 51.6 % 99 % 71.2 % 97.7 %
Combined Allo-Ego average of last 4 attempts Error 97 % 73.9 % 0.1787 0.906, p < 0.001* 16.4 % 99.8 % 29.2 % 99.6 % 41.4 % 99.2 % 48.2 % 99 % 68.3 % 97.7 %
Time 100 % 73.9 % 0.1886 0.889, p < 0.001* 16.8 % 100 % 29.9 % 100 % 42.2 % 100 % 48.9 % 100 % 69 % 100 %
Combined Allo-Ego average of all 8 attempts Error 93.9 % 80.7 % 0.2453 0.917, p < 0.001* 20.4 % 99.6 % 35.1 % 99.2 % 48.1 % 98.6 % 54.9 % 98.1 % 73.8 % 95.8 %
Time 96.9 % 77.3 % 0.2624 0.888, p < 0.001* 18.3 % 99.8 % 32.2 % 99.6 % 44.8 % 99.2 % 51.6 % 99 % 71.2 % 97.7 %
Ego average of first 4 attempts Error 93.9 % 77.3 % 0.1874 0.920, p < 0.001* 17.9 % 99.6 % 31.5 % 99.1 % 44.1 % 98.5 % 50.8 % 98.1 % 70.6 % 95.6 %
Allo average of first 4 attempts Error 100 % 70.5 % 0.1658 0.893, p < 0.001* 15.1 % 100 % 27.4 % 100 % 39.2 % 100 % 45.9 % 100 % 66.3 % 100 %
Combined Allo-Ego average of first 4 attempts Error 90.9 % 83 % 0.2774 0.917, p < 0.001* 22 % 99.4 % 37.3 % 98.8 % 50.5 % 98 % 57.2 % 97.3 % 75.6 % 94 %

Allo, allocentric; AUC, area under the curve; Ego, egocentric; HC, healthy control; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; Prev, prevalence.