Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique logoLink to Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique
. 1997 Jul 1;88(4):238–241. doi: 10.1007/BF03404789

Factors Influencing the Duration of Breastfeeding in the Sudbury Region

Gisèle L Bourgoin 16,, Noëlla R Lahaie 26, Betty A Rheaume 16, Monique G Berger 36, Cheryl V Dovigi 16, Louise M Picard 16, Vic F Sahai 16
PMCID: PMC6990291  PMID: 9336092

Abstract

Objective

To determine the duration of breastfeeding in the Sudbury Region and to identify the reasons why mothers wean before the Canadian Paediatric Society’s recommended six month period.

Methods

Questionnaires addressing factors that influence the duration of breastfeeding were mailed to 350 breastfeeding mothers at one/two weeks, three months and six months after their postpartum discharge from hospital. Results: Forty percent of mothers breastfed for the recommended six month period. Reported factors positively influencing longer durations of breastfeeding were higher education, higher family income, parity, previous breastfeeding experience, decision to breastfeed before the child was born and late introduction to solids. Reasons for weaning included perceived insufficient milk supply, fatigue, breast problems and return to work. Mothers’ top three choices of services were home visits, telephone hot line and television programs.

Conclusions

The duration of breastfeeding in the Sudbury Region is lower than the provincial average. Several modifiable factors associated with duration of breastfeeding were identified.

References

  • 1.Nutrition Committee, Canadian Paediatric Society. Meeting the iron needs of infants and young children: an update. Can Med Assoc J. 1991;144:1451–54. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ontario Public Health Association. Breastfeeding Position Paper. Toronto: OPHA; 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ontario Ministry of Health . Public Health Branch. Ontario Health Survey. Toronto: Ont Min Health; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Valaitis R, Shea E. An evaluation of breastfeeding promotion literature: Does it really promote breastfeeding? Can J Public Health. 1993;84:24–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McKilligan H. Breastfeeding knowledge, attitudes, practice. Public Health Epidemiol Rep Ont. 1991;1(2):21–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lynch A, Koch A, Hislop G, Coldman A. Evaluating the effect of a breastfeeding consultant on the duration of breastfeeding. CanJ Public Health. 1986;77:190–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Maclean HM. Women’s experience of breastfeeding: A much needed perspective. Health Promotion. 1989;3(4):361–70. doi: 10.1093/heapro/3.4.361. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Beaudry M, Aucoin-Larade L. Who breastfeeds in New Brunswick, when and why? Can J Public Health. 1989;80:166–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mackey S, Fried P. Infant breast and bottle feeding practices: Some related factors and attitudes. Can J Public Health. 1981;72:312–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rogers C, Morris S, Taper L. Weaning from the breast: Influences on maternal decisions. Paediatr Nurs. 1987;13(5):341–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.WHO/UNICEF. Protecting, Promoting, And Supporting Breast Feeding: The Special Role Of Maternity Services. 1989. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Canadian Institute of Child Health. National Breastfeeding Guidelines for Health Care Providers. Ottawa: CICH; 1996. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES