Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 12;27(2):373–383. doi: 10.1177/1073191117727346

Table 4.

Mean CNS VS Normed Scores of Dutch Participants (N = 158) Compared With the American Normative Data (M = 100; SD = 15).

M (SD)a Mean difference z test P Effect size db
Domain
 Verbal memory 98.66 (14.99) −1.34 −1.11 .268 −0.09
 Visual memory 101.81 (12.98) 1.81 1.50 .133 0.12
 Processing speed 104.52 (14.48) 4.52 3.77 <.001* 0.30
 Psychomotor speed 107.17 (12.87) 7.17 5.97 <.001* 0.49
 Reaction time 101.41 (11.13) 1.41 1.17 .242 0.09
 Complex attention 101.88 (11.66) 1.88 1.54 .124 0.13
 Cognitive flexibility 102.91 (12.94) 2.91 2.39 .017* 0.19
Test
 Verbal memory test
  Direct recognition correct hits 99.01 (14.66) −0.99 −0.79 .425 −0.07
  Direct recognition correct rejections 100.94 (12.58) 0.94 0.76 .447 0.06
  Delayed recognition correct hits 98.16 (14.86) −1.84 −1.48 .138 0.12
  Delayed recognition correct rejections 98.98 (14.07) −1.02 −0.89 .370 0.08
 Visual memory test
  Direct recognition correct hits 99.50 (13.97) −0.50 −0.40 .685 0.03
  Direct recognition correct rejections 102.53 (13.35) 2.53 2.05 .040 0.17
  Delayed recognition correct hits 98.46 (12.06) −1.54 −1.25 .211 −0.10
  Delayed recognition correct rejections 103.86 (11.43) 3.86 3.13 .002* 0.26
 Finger-tapping test
  Number of taps right 106.79 (12.66) 6.79 5.52 <.001* 0.46
  Number of taps left 104.81 (12.99) 4.81 3.92 <.001* 0.33
 Symbol digit coding test
  Number correct 105.37 (14.27) 5.37 4.39 <.001* 0.36
 Stroop test
  Reaction time Part I 101.11 (10.01) 1.11 0.91 .364 0.08
  Reaction time Part II 100.48 (12.78) 0.48 0.39 .698 0.03
  Reaction time Part III 102.34 (10.48) 2.34 1.90 .057 0.16
 Shifting attention test
  Number correct 102.97 (14.16) 2.97 2.42 .016* 0.20
  Reaction time 100.51 (15.13) 0.51 0.42 .678 0.03
 Continuous performance test
  Number correct 101.67 (9.48) 1.67 1.37 .172 0.12

Note. CNS VS = Central Nervous System Vital Signs.

a

CNS VS normed scores based on the American normative sample have a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15; higher scores indicate better performance; positive mean difference indicates better performance for the Dutch sample and vice versa. bCohen’s d effect sizes: ≤.20 to .49, small; .50 to .79, medium; ≥.80, large (Cohen, 1988).

*

p < .02.