Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 30;17:10. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-0646-1

Table 4.

Change scores (post-training change from baseline) of clinical outcome measures for Robot group (R_Group) and Control group (C_Group)

Outcome measure R_Group C_Group Between-group difference P-value Cohen’s d
(N = 19)
Mean (SD)
(N = 19)
Mean (SD)
(R_Group-C_Group)a
Mean (95% CI)
Mean (95% CI)
Primary
 FM-UE (0–66)b 7.0 (6.3) 6.2 (9.3) 2.4 (−2.3 to 7.1) 0.311 0.35 (−0.29 to 0.99)
Secondary
 P_FM-UE (0–42)b 3.6 (4.3) 3.7 (5.7) 1.6 (−1.8 to 5.0) 0.339 0.33 (−0.31 to 0.97)
 D_FM-UE (0–24) b 2.7 (3.6) 2.4 (4.5) 1.0 (−1.5 to 3.5) 0.441 0.26 (−0.38 to 0.90)
 RPS (0–36) b 4.1 (5.2) 3.2 (8.1) 2.1 (−2.2 to 6.4) 0.328 0.34 (−0.31 to 0.98)
 P_MAS (0–8) c −0.5 (1.3) 0.2 (1.2) −0.9 (−1.6 to − 0.2) 0.018 −0.83 (− 1.49 to − 0.17)
 D_MAS (0–12) c −0.1 (2.1) 0.2 (1.7) −0.4 (− 1.5 to 0.7) 0.499 − 0.22 (− 0.87 to 0.41)
 FIM (18–126) b 9.3 (5.8) 8.7 (11.6) 2.3 (−3.6 to 8.2) 0.439 0.27 (− 0.37 to 0.90)

SD standard deviation, 95% CI 95% Confidence Interval, FM_UE Fugl-Meyer motor assessment for the Upper Extremities, P_FM-UE and D_FM-UE proximal and distal portion of FM-UE, RPS Reaching Performance Scale, MAS Modified Ashworth Scale, P_MAS and D_MAS MAS for proximal and distal muscles, FIM Functional Independence Measure. P-values indicate the results of the comparison between R_Group and C_Group (analysis of covariance, ANCOVA)

aAdjusted for baseline score by ANCOVA

bHigher scores indicate better performance

cLower scores indicate better performance