Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 29;19:51. doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-3099-x

Table 2.

Uptake of IPTp-SP by study arm

Intervention (n = 510) Control (n = 508) Difference p-value
Nasarawa State, Nigeria
 Mean doses of IPTp-SP received (SD) 3.45 (1.53) 2.14 (1.55) − 1.31 < 0.001
 Doses of IPTp-SP received during ANC n (%) n (%)
 2+ 467 (91.6) 308 (60.6%) 31.0 < 0.001
 3+ 347 (68.0) 183 (36.0) 32.0 0.052
 4+ 268 (52.6) 83 (16.3) 36.3 0.004
 5+ 146 (29.6) 43 (8.5) 21.1 0.034
Intervention (n = 211) Control (n = 208) Difference p-value
Kisumu County, Kenya
 Mean doses of IPTp-SP received (SD) 3.81 (2.35) 2.72 (1.65) 1.09 < 0.001
 Doses of IPTp-SP received during ANC n (%) n (%)
 2+ 163 (77.3) 150 (72.1) 5.2 0.590
 3+ 156 (73.9) 116 (55.8) 18.1 0.100
 4+ 131 (62.1) 77 (37.0) 25.1 0.056
 5+ 97 (46.0) 27 (13.0) 33.0 < 0.001