Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 22;155(3):233–242. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.5474

Table 2. Postoperative Outcomes in the Prehab vs Rehab Groups.

Outcome Prehab Group Rehab Group Adjusted Estimate (95% CI)a P Value
No. of Patients Data No. of Patients Data
Comprehensive Complication Indexb
Mean (SD) 55 12.7 (21.5) 55 15.7 (25.3) MD, –3.2 (–11.8 to 5.3) .45
Median (IQR) 55 0 (0 to 12.2) 55 0 (0 to 29.6)
Complications, No. (%)b
Overall 55 25 (45.5) 55 25 (45.5) OR, 0.9 (0.4 to 2.2) .90
Severe 55 7 (12.7) 55 11 (20.0) OR, 0.5 (0.1 to 1.6) .23
Primary LOS, median (IQR), d 55 4 (3 to 8) 55 4 (3 to 8) HR, 19.2 (–2.9 to 2.2) .80
Total LOS, median (IQR), db 55 4 (3 to 8) 55 5 (3 to 9) MD, –5.8 (–17.3 to 5.8) .32
Emergency department visit, No. (%)b 55 3 (5.5) 55 6 (10.9) OR, 0.3 (0.1 to 1.9) .21
Hospital readmission, No. (%)b 55 2 (3.6) 55 5 (9.1) OR, 0.3 (0.03 to 1.9) .18

Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; IQR, interquartile range; LOS, length of stay; MD, mean difference; OR, odds ratio; Prehab, prehabilitation; Rehab, rehabilitation.

a

Coefficients were derived with imputation of missing data and adjustment for confounders, including recruitment site (fixed-effect), age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, colon vs rectal surgery, minimally invasive vs open surgery, baseline 6-minute walk test, body mass index, and Fried Frailty Index (2-3 vs 4-5). No data were missing for the variables described, so imputation was conducted only for adjustment variables. The multiple imputation model is described in eMethods 3 in Supplement 2.

b

Measured at 30 days.