Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 13;180(3):420–428. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.6447

Table 4. Association of Clopidogrel vs Ticagrelor With Outcomes Within 1 Year After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome in Propensity Score–Matched Cohort.

Outcome No. (%) P Value HR (95% CI)
Clopidogrel Group (n = 3711) Ticagrelor Group (n = 3711)
MACE 368 (9.9) 380 (10.2) .64 1.00 (0.86-1.17)
All-cause death 54 (1.5) 61 (1.6) .51 1.10 (0.75-1.61)
ACS 228 (6.1) 235 (6.3) .74 1.02 (0.84-1.24)
Coronary revascularization 168 (4.5) 157 (4.2) .53 0.86 (0.67-1.09)
PCI 121 (3.3) 114 (3.1) .64 0.90 (0.68-1.19)
CABG 50 (1.3) 44 (1.2) .53 0.74 (0.47-1.15)
Stent thrombosis 7 (0.2) 18 (0.5) .03 2.57 (1.07-6.16)a
Composite of all-cause death, ACS, or stroke 290 (7.8) 299 (8.1) .70 1.02 (0.86-1.21)
Ischemic stroke 18 (0.5) 17 (0.5) .87 0.94 (0.48-1.86)
Major bleed 182 (4.9) 261 (7.0) <.001 1.52 (1.24-1.87)a
Intracranial 3 (0.1) 3 (0.1) >.99 1.00 (0.14-7.10)
Gastrointestinal 53 (1.4) 95 (2.6) <.001 2.10 (1.44-3.06)a
Pulmonary 81 (2.2) 105 (2.8) .08 1.32 (0.97-1.80)
Urologic 29 (0.8) 37 (1.0) .32 1.32 (0.79-2.22)
Other 32 (0.9) 38 (1.0) .47 1.29 (0.78-2.11)
Dyspnea 46 (1.2) 116 (3.1) <.001 2.42 (1.70-3.45)a

Abbreviations: ACS, acute coronary syndrome; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; HR, hazard ratio; MACE, major adverse coronary event; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.

a

Statistically significant results.