Table 3. Patient Global Ratings.
Rating Scale | No. (%) | P Valuea | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Behavioral Therapy | Drug Therapy | Combined Therapy | ||
After 6-wk Follow-up (Stage 1) | ||||
Total, No. | 64 | 65 | 61 | NA |
Global perception of improvement | ||||
Much better | 13 (20) | 9 (14) | 24 (39) | <.001 |
Better | 39 (61) | 33 (51) | 31 (51) | |
About the same | 12 (19) | 22 (34) | 6 (10) | |
Worse | 0 | 1 (2) | 0 | |
Satisfaction with progress | ||||
Completely | 18 (28) | 13 (20) | 30 (49) | <.001 |
Somewhat satisfied | 42 (66) | 41 (63) | 30 (49) | |
Somewhat dissatisfied | 3 (5) | 8 (12) | 1 (2) | |
Very dissatisfied | 1 (2) | 3 (5) | 0 | |
How bothersome were adverse effects? | ||||
No adverse effects | 33 (52) | 12 (18) | 8 (13) | <.001 |
Not at all bothersome | 22 (34) | 9 (14) | 13 (21) | |
A little | 6 (9) | 20 (31) | 29 (48) | |
Somewhat | 3 (5) | 18 (28) | 10 (16) | |
Extremely | 0 | 6 (9) | 1 (2) | |
Wish to receive another form of treatment | 44 (69) | 38 (58) | 27 (44) | .02 |
After 12-wk Follow-up (Stage 2) | ||||
Total, No. | 62 | 61 | 59 | NA |
Global perception of improvement | ||||
Much better | 28 (45) | 26 (43) | 30 (51) | .32 |
Better | 27 (43) | 26 (43) | 26 (44) | |
About the same | 5 (8) | 9 (15) | 3 (5) | |
Worse | 2 (3) | 0 | 0 | |
Satisfaction with progress | ||||
Completely | 32 (52) | 32 (52) | 28 (47) | .82 |
Somewhat satisfied | 26 (42) | 28 (46) | 29 (49) | |
Somewhat dissatisfied | 3 (5) | 0 | 1 (2) | |
Very dissatisfied | 1 (2) | 1 (2) | 1 (2) | |
How bothersome were adverse effects? | ||||
No adverse effects | 13 (21) | 9 (15) | 12 (20) | .55 |
Not at all bothersome | 17 (27) | 12 (20) | 10 (17) | |
A little | 16 (26) | 27 (44) | 16 (27) | |
Somewhat | 14 (23) | 12 (20) | 19 (32) | |
Extremely | 2 (3) | 1 (2) | 2 (3) | |
Wish to receive another form of treatment | 23 (37) | 20 (33) | 16 (27) | .50 |
Abbreviation: NA, not applicable.
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel procedure used to account to the ordinal nature of response.