Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 1;16(3):388–395. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.39773

Table 4.

Cox risk model analysis of prognostic influencing factor for uterine sarcoma

Variable Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR(95%CI) P-value HR(95%CI) P-value
Histological types 0.001 <0.001
LG-ESS 1(referent) 1(referent)
HG-ESS 3.626(1.543-8.518) 0.003 5.969(2.359-15.103) <0.001
UUS 8.019(3.238-19.862) <0.001 18.356(6.043-55.759) <0.001
LMS 1.542(0.724-3.284) 0.261 2.294(1.011-5.203) 0.047
AS 1.707(0.486-5.999) 0.404 2.240(0.479-10.472) 0.305
FIGO stage <0.001 <0.001
1(referent) 1(referent)
1.876(0.563-6.258) 0.306 3.841(1.097-13.442) 0.035
3.170(1.356-7.409) 0.008 3.573(1.468-8.695) 0.005
8.676(4.276-17.604) <0.001 14.451(6.359-32.841) <0.001
Age(years) 0.512
<50 1(referent)
≥50 1.220(0.673-2.213)
Menstrual status 0.021
premenopausal 1(referent)
postmenopausal 1.974(1.106-3.522)
Tumor size(cm) 0.316
≤5cm 1(referent)
>5cm 1.400(0.725-2.705)
NLR 0.008
<3.61 1(referent)
≥3.61 2.265(1.243-4.218)

LG-ESS: low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma; HG-ESS: high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma; UUS: undifferentiated uterine sarcoma; LMS: leiomyosarcoma; AS: adenosarcoma; HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval; NLR: neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio.