Summary of findings 11. Group TFCBT compared with Group non‐TFCBT for chronic post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in adults.
| Group CBT (trauma focused) compared with Group CBT (non‐trauma focused) for chronic post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in adults | ||||||
| Patient or population: Adults with PTSD for at least 3 months Settings: Primary care, community, outpatient Intervention: Group TFCBT Comparison: Group non‐TFCBT | ||||||
| Outcomes | Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) | Relative effect (95% CI) | No of Participants (studies) | Quality of the evidence (GRADE) | Comments | |
| Assumed risk | Corresponding risk | |||||
| Group CBT (non‐trauma focused) | Group CBT (trauma focused) | |||||
| Severity of PTSD symptoms ‐ Clinician‐rated | See comment | See comment | Not estimable | 325 (1 study) | ⊕⊝⊝⊝ very low1,2 | |
| Leaving the study early for any reason | See comment | See comment | Not estimable | 360 (1 study) | ⊕⊝⊝⊝ very low1,2 | |
| *The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). CI: Confidence interval; | ||||||
| GRADE Working Group grades of evidence High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect. Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate. Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate. Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate. | ||||||
1Insufficient information to judge risk of bias 2One study with a small sample size