Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 13;2013(12):CD003388. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003388.pub4

Duffy 2007.

Methods Randomised controlled trial
Participants 58 participants mostly resulting from the troubles in Northern Ireland (23 women, 35 men)
Interventions 12 weekly sessions of cognitive therapy (n = 29) vs waiting list (n = 29). Cross‐over trial.
Outcomes PDS, BDI, SDS
Notes Experienced therapists (1 social worker, 1 psychiatrist, and 3 nurse therapists). Treatment adherence does not seem to have been assessed.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: The method of sequence generation was not reported. Participants were randomised remotely.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "An independent office allocated patients to immediate therapy or to wait followed by therapy on a stratified random basis using the minimisation method of Pocock. Assessors were not aware of the allocation algorithm".
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "We carried out analyses on an intention to treat basis". Reasons for drop‐out were reported (9 from cognitive therapy and 3 from waiting list).
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: All specified outcomes were reported,
Other bias High risk Treatment adherence was not measured.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Comment: Participants were aware of their allocation.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: Measures were self‐reported, but it is unclear how these were administered.