Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 13;2013(12):CD003388. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003388.pub4

Fecteau 1999.

Methods Randomised controlled trial
Participants 23 road traffic accidents in Canada. 14 women, 6 men completed the study. It is unclear how many men and women entered the study originally
Interventions 8 ‐ 10 hours CBT (n = 12) vs waitlist (n = 11)
Outcomes CAPS, IES, BDI, BAI
Notes Experienced therapists delivered therapy and treatment adherence was assessed
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "participants were then randomly assigned to the treatment or WLC groups by the flip of a coin".
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: There is no mention of any measures taken to conceal allocation.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Comment: 2 participants dropped out of the treatment group and 1 dropped off the waitlist. Reasons for attrition are reported. Only the data of completers are included in the analysis.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: All specified outcomes were reported, although the lack of effect on the measure of depression is not divulged in the abstract.
Other bias High risk Comment: Small sample size.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Comment: Participants were aware of their allocation.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: Outcome measures were rated by an "independent assessor".