Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 13;2013(12):CD003388. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003388.pub4

Ironson 2002.

Methods Randomised controlled trial
Participants 22 victims of various traumas with DSM‐IIIR PTSD (17 women, 5 men) in the USA
Interventions 3 preparatory sessions followed by 1 ‐ 3 sessions of EMDR (n = 10) or prolonged exposure (n = 12)
Outcomes PSS‐SR, BDI
Notes Experienced therapists delivered therapy and treatment adherence was assessed. Therapists delivered both treatments.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: The method of sequence generation was not reported.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: There is no mention of any measures taken to conceal allocation.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: ITT analyses were performed. Reasons for drop‐out were not fully reported (1 from EMDR, 6 from TFCBT).
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: All specified outcomes were reported.
Other bias High risk Comment: Baseline characteristics are poorly reported. Small sample size.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Comment: Participants were aware of their allocation.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Comment: All measures were self report, but assessors were not blind.