Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 13;2013(12):CD003388. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003388.pub4

Ready 2010.

Methods Randomised controlled trial
Participants 11 Vietnam War veterans with DSM‐IV PTSD with a CAPS score greater than 60 in the USA
Interventions 10 sessions of Virtual Reality Exposure (n = 6) vs 10 sessions of person‐centred therapy (n = 5)
Outcomes CAPS, BDI
Notes Therapist credentials/experience is not reported. It is unclear whether or not treatment adherence was assessed.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: The method of sequence generation was not reported.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: There is no mention of any measures taken to conceal allocation.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: One participant dropped out of each group. Reasons for drop‐out are not reported. It is unclear how missing data were handled.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: All specified outcomes were reported.
Other bias High risk Comment: PCT was developed as a control condition for the purposes of the study.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Comment: Participants were aware of their allocation.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: “Participants were administered the measures or interviews at pretreatment, posttreatment, and six‐month follow‐up by a licensed clinical psychologist with 3 years of experience working with Vietnam veterans. She remained blind to treatment condition.”