Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 13;2013(12):CD003388. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003388.pub4

Wells 2012.

Methods Randomised controlled trial
Participants 20 individuals with DSM‐IV PTSD (11 women, 9 men) in the UK
Interventions Meta cognitive therapy (n = 10) vs delayed treatment (n = 10)
Outcomes PDS, IES, BDI, BAI, TSQ
Notes Therapist credentials/experience is not reported. Treatment adherence was not formally assessed.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Comment: Allocated by a coin toss.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Comment: Allocation was performed by an individual otherwise not involved with the study.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: ITT analyses were performed. One participant dropped out of the MCT group.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: All specified outcomes were reported.
Other bias High risk Comment: Small sample size.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Comment: Participants were aware of their allocation.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: The assessor was blind.