Skip to main content
. 2001 Jul 23;2001(3):CD003250. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003250

Comparison 6. IV oxytocin and amniotomy versus vaginal PG: all women, unfavourable cervix.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Vaginal delivery not achieved within 24 hours 1 42 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.9 [0.46, 1.75]
3 Caesarean section 2 106 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.48, 2.03]
5 Serious maternal morbidity or death 1 60 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
6 Cervix unfavourable/unchanged after 12 ‐24 hours 2 94 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.69 [0.20, 2.35]
7 Oxytocin augmentation 1 60 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.07 [0.00, 1.12]
8 Uterine hyperstimulation without FHR changes 1 60 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 5.0 [0.25, 99.95]
9 Uterine rupture 1 42 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.0 [0.13, 69.70]
10 Epidural analgesia/opioid analgesia 4 472 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.05 [0.81, 1.35]
11 Instrumental vaginal delivery 2 102 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.25 [0.54, 2.90]
13 Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes 2 126 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 7.33 [0.39, 137.73]
14 Neonatal intensive care unit admission 1 42 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.0 [0.13, 69.70]
23 Post partum haemorrhage 1 60 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.0 [0.33, 27.23]
29 Precipitate labour 1 60 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.0 [0.13, 70.83]