Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 21;24(2):1300–1310. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.14782

Table 3.

Associations between BMI1, PTEN, PHLPP1 and PHLPP2 mRNAs expression and clinicopathological data

Clinicopathological parameter BMI‐1 PTEN PHLPP1 PHLPP2
Mean ± SD P‐value Mean ± SD P‐value Mean ± SD P‐value Mean ± SD P‐value
Normal 1760 ± 156 .08 8941 ± 1319 .051 7279 ± 1257 .135 885.0 ± 189.9 .039
Cancer 2504 ± 272 11 681 ± 2557 5803 ± 690.3 526.4 ± 76.33
Grade
1 1702 ± 179 .065 7011 ± 1865 .013 a 5946 ± 1392 .807 540.3 ± 186.6 .509
2 3050 ± 106 12 514 ± 3106 6198 ± 1005 538.6 ± 106.3
3 3920 ± 350 3465 ± 843.3 4520 ± 951.3 478.5 ± 118.5
Stage
I 3076 ± 450 .09 7632 ± 1124 .012 b 6951 ± 1002 .091 602.4 ± 108.9 .284
II 2750 ± 206 2820 ± 645.5 3873 ± 851.7 317.8 ± 62.4
III + IV 2078 ± 388 5458 ± 1523 4784 ± 1592 557.2 ± 213.4
Lymph node metastasis
No 2432 ± 276 .046 11 400 ± 2775 .905 5862 ± 738.0 .425 507.2 ± 77.7 .950
Yes 1690 ± 305 6554 ± 1949 5474 ± 2003 633.1 ± 262.2

Kruskal‐Wallis test was used to compare more than two groups. For pairwise multiple comparisons the Dunn's post hoc test was used.

Bold and italic values show statistically significant differences.

a

2 vs 3.

b

I vs II.