Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 28;24(2):1599–1613. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.14851

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of the correlation of prognosis with ER and clinicopathologic data in GBC

  Univariable analysis Multivariable analysis
HR (95% CI) P‐value HR (95% CI) P‐value
Sex (male vs female) 0.748 (0.481‐1.164) .199    
Age (<65 vs ≥65) 0.873 (0.582‐1.310) .511    
Tumour size (≥4 cm vs <4 cm) 1.778 (1.173‐2.695) .007* 1.427 (0.904‐2.252) .126
Histological grade (III‐IV vs I‐II) 1.503 (1.004‐2.250) .048* 1.487 (0.990‐2.234) .056
TNM stage (III‐IV vs I–II) 1.946 (1.258‐3.010) .003* 1.717 (0.997‐2.958) .051
Lymph node metastasis (presence vs absence) 1.600 (1.049‐2.441) .029* 1.106 (0.657‐1.859) .705
Distant metastasis (presence vs absence) 1.806 (1.196‐2.728) .005* 1.083 (0.606‐1.936) .788
ER expression (high vs low) 1.799 (1.160‐2.790) .009* 1.685 (1.071‐2.651) .024*

P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.

*

P < .05.