TABLE I.
VALIDATION RESULTS (F-SCORE) ON 15 2D PATHOLOGIC IMAGES
|
d |
HDoG F-score |
LoG F-score |
HDoG vs. LoG p-value |
gLoG F-score |
HDoG vs. gLoG p-value |
HLoG F-score |
HDoG vs. HLoG p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.049 | 0.041 | 0.051= | 0.046 | 0.496= | 0.042 | 0.071= |
| 1 | 0.197 | 0.172 | 0.008+ | 0.193 | 0.696= | 0.184 | 0.131= |
| 2 | 0.405 | 0.348 | 0.000+ | 0.402 | 0.858= | 0.385 | 0.154= |
| 3 | 0.623 | 0.531 | 0.000+ | 0.616 | 0.708= | 0.609 | 0.391= |
| 4 | 0.738 | 0.634 | 0.000+ | 0.737 | 0.953= | 0.731 | 0.648= |
| 5 | 0.81 | 0.703 | 0.000+ | 0.816 | 0.687= | 0.811 | 0.923= |
| 6 | 0.847 | 0.738 | 0.000+ | 0.849 | 0.871= | 0.849 | 0.842= |
| 7 | 0.868 | 0.76 | 0.000+ | 0.867 | 0.877= | 0.87 | 0.789= |
| 8 | 0.885 | 0.777 | 0.000+ | 0.88 | 0.579= | 0.886 | 0.860= |
| 9 | 0.894 | 0.79 | 0.000+ | 0.891 | 0.702= | 0.895 | 0.772= |
| 10 | 0.901 | 0.801 | 0.000+ | 0.897 | 0.642= | 0.904 | 0.544= |
| 11 | 0.906 | 0.807 | 0.000+ | 0.903 | 0.643= | 0.909 | 0.561= |
| 12 | 0.911 | 0.813 | 0.000+ | 0.907 | 0.596= | 0.915 | 0.512= |
| 13 | 0.918 | 0.82 | 0.000+ | 0.912 | 0.419= | 0.922 | 0.497= |
| 14 | 0.923 | 0.827 | 0.000+ | 0.917 | 0.423= | 0.928 | 0.370= |
| 15 | 0.927 | 0.838 | 0.000+ | 0.921 | 0.456= | 0.934 | 0.300= |
| 16 | 0.931 | 0.849 | 0.000+ | 0.927 | 0.541= | 0.938 | 0.322= |
The normalizing factor γ =2 based on prior experiments. Detailed of the parameter setting please refer to ). Paired T-tests were performed at a significance level of 0.05. Symbols in cell means: + statistically outperformed; = Statistically Comparable; - Statistically Underperformed