Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Youth Adolesc. 2019 Aug 24;49(1):311–322. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01107-x

Table 3.

Results of Auxiliary Analyses for the 2-Profle Model of Internalizing Symptoms

Low Symptoms Agreement (Profile 1; n = 240) Youth-Reported High Somatization and Anxiety (Profile 2; n = 106) Omnibus χ2 test Pairwise Comparisonsa
M SD M SD χ2 P ϕ
Parenting (CR)
Involvement 25.87 8.70 24.35 7.28 2.76 .10 .09 --
Positive Parenting 19.80 4.01 19.39 4.52 0.61 .43 .04 --
Monitoring 33.67 8.21 31.61 8.03 10.32 <0.01 .17 1 > 2
Inconsistent Discipline 7.32 4.45 8.69 6.31 4.33 .04 .11 2 > 1
Caregiver Total Social Support 6.07 3.70 6.74 7.39 0.61 .43 .04 --
Caregiver Social Support-Satisfaction 22.52 13.35 23.62 36.97 0.07 .79 .01 --
School Engagement (YR)
Connection to Teachers 12.94 3.86 10.67 3.39 20.88 <0.01 .25 1 > 2
Academic Engagement 11.08 2.60 9.60 2.48 27.93 <0.01 .28 1 > 2
Whole-School Connectedness 9.25 2.99 7.37 2.99 21.59 <0.01 .25 1 > 2
Student Connectedness 10.50 3.27 8.22 4.49 16.35 <0.01 .22 1 > 2

Note. CR = caregiver report, YR = youth report.

a

For significant omnibus tests, all pairwise comparisons are significant at the p < .05 level.