Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Youth Adolesc. 2019 Aug 24;49(1):311–322. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01107-x

Table 4.

Results of Auxiliary Analyses for the 3-Profle Model of Externalizing Symptoms

Low Symptoms Agreement (Profile 1; n = 216) Teacher-Reported High Externalizing (Profile 2; n = 59) Caregiver-Reported High Externalizing (Profile 3; n = 69) Omnibus χ2 test Pairwise Comparisonsa
M SD M SD M SD χ2 P ϕ
Parenting (CR)
Involvement 25.50 6.44 25.94 8.66 24.06 9.10 1.83 .40 .07 --
Positive Parenting 19.40 3.06 21.03 5.15 19.26 4.82 8.17 .02 .15 2 > 1
Monitoring 33.67 6.76 32.80 11.60 29.75 11.88 9.34 .01 .16 1 > 3
Inconsistent Discipline 7.16 4.84 7.51 6.30 11.33 9.33 12.38 < 0.01 .19 3 > 2,1
Caregiver Total Social Support 6.61 3.09 5.56 6.30 5.64 10.05 2.41 .30 .08 --
Caregiver Social Support-Satisfaction 23.37 15.28 22.02 15.82 21.49 39.46 0.47 .79 .04 --
School Engagement (YR)
Connection to Teachers 12.48 3.34 11.34 2.91 12.23 3.36 5.97 .05 .13 --
Academic Engagement 10.88 2.42 9.38 2.80 10.83 1.84 15.42 <0.01 .21 1,3 > 2
Whole-School Connectedness 8.69 3.35 8.54 3.08 8.73 2.64 0.14 .94 .02 --
Student Connectedness 9.82 3.23 9.73 4.80 10.04 2.84 0.37 .83 .03 --

Note. CR = caregiver report, YR = youth report.

a

For significant omnibus tests, all pairwise comparisons are significant at the p < .05 level.