Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 30;10:1529. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58412-w

Figure 5.

Figure 5

TVNS-paired extinction facilitates subsequent extinction of fear 24 hours later. Upper Panel (a and b): Mean shock expectancy ratings averaged across blocks of two subsequent extinction test trials for the sham stimulation (blue) and tVNS condition (red) in the fear learning group (a: left) and in the control group (b: right). Error bars represent SEM. Fear learning group participants who underwent extinction training under tVNS showed facilitated subsequent extinction 24 hours after the extinction training, indicated by a stronger decrease in shock expectancy ratings in the tVNS relative to the sham condition (see a). No such effect was observed in the control group (see b). Lower Panel (c and d): Mean startle potentiation (standardized (T-scores) blink magnitudes elicited during the CS minus standardized (T-scores) blink magnitudes elicited during the inter-trial intervals) averaged across two probe stimuli presented during the subsequent extinction test. Potentiation scores are presented for the sham stimulation (blue) and the tVNS condition (red) in the fear learning group (c: left) and the control group (d: right). Again, error bars represent SEM. Subsequent extinction of fear potentiated startle was accelerated by tVNS relative to sham (see c). No such effect was observed in the control group (see d).