Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 13;132(1):45–52. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldz032

Table 1.

Differences between amoebic and pyogenic abscess

Amoebic abscess Pyogenic abscess
Pathogen Entamoeba histolytica Klebsiella pneumoniae, Streptococcus milleri, Escheria coli, Burkholderia pseudomallei, Staphylococcus aureus, Polymicrobial including anaerobes
Distribution Globally, higher rates in LMICs, typically males 30–50 years Globally, older patients
Acquisition Poor sanitation, contaminated drinking water Biliary source, e.g. impacted gall stone
Systemic infection
Pathogenesis Inflammation—abundant neutrophils Necrosis—absence of neutrophils
Imaging Usually single (can be multiple)
Typically in right lobe (can be in left lobe)
Cold appearance on sulfur colloid scan
Either single or multiple
Any lobe can be involved
Hot appearance on sulfur colloid scan
Fine needle aspirate Macroscopic—thick, chocolate brown, odourless, ‘anchovy paste’
Microscopy for trophozoites—insensitive (25%)
Antigen testing—sensitive and specific, generally not available in LMICs
PCR—sensitive and specific, generally not available in LMICs
Macroscopic—purulent, may be foul smelling
Culture—limited availability in LMICs
Other diagnostic modalities Serology—useful in returned travelers, limited role in residents of high endemicity
Antigen testing of serum—sensitive and specific, generally not available in LMICs
Blood cultures—sensitivity 50%, limited availability in LMICs, in LMICs patients often pre-treated with antimicrobials prior to specimen collection.
Treatment Medical therapy with metronidazole usually sufficient. (May require drainage in co-infection or impending rupture.) Percutaneous drainage along with antibiotics is mainstay of therapy. Antibiotic treatment in small responsive abscesses.