Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 2;42:100752. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100752

Table 2.

Summary of ANCOVA results for DTI parameters in white matter tracts (a) and perisylvian cortical regions (b).

Structural maturation
a. White matter tracts
ANCOVA with all tracts averaged over hemispheres
age : F (1,20)= 62.6, p < 0.001
tract : F (2,40)= 64.5, p < 0.001
age x tract : F (2,40) < 1, p = 0.734

ANCOVA with only AR and AF
age : F (1,20)= 47.6, p < 0.001
tract : F (1,20)= 59.2, p < 0.001
hemisphere : (1,20)= 14.8, p = 0.001
age x tract : F (1,20) <1, p = 0.457
age x hemisphere : F (1,20) <1, p = 0.914
tract x hemisphere : F (1,20) <1, p = 0.673
age x tract x hemisphere : F (1,20) <1, p = 0.796

Posthoc comparisons
Left Hemisphere
AF vs. AR, t(1,21)= 7.9, p < 0.001
AF vs. ACC, t(1,21)= 9.4, p < 0.001
AR vs. ACC, t(1,21) = 1.7, p = 0.096
Right Hemisphere
AF vs. AR, t(1,21)= 5.6, p < 0.001
AF vs. ACC, t(1,21)= 15.9, p < 0.001
AR vs. ACC, t(1,21)= 4.5, p < 0.001
Left vs Right tracts
AF, t(1,21)= -2.7, p = 0.014
AR, t(1,21)= -3.7, p = 0.002
b. Perisylvian regions
age : F (1,19)= 51.5, p < 0.001
region : F (5,95)= 101.5, p < 0.001
age x hemisphere : F (1,19) <1, p = 0.379
region x hemisphere : F (5,95)= 7.5, p < 0.001
age x region x hemisphere : F (5,95) = 1.4, p = 0.233

Posthoc comparisons
Left Hemisphere
IFG vs. MTG, t(1,20)= 2.3, p = 0.031
MTG vs. STG, t(1,20)= 3.6, p = 0.002
STG vs. AG, t(1,20)= 2.3, p = 0.033
AG vs. PT, t(1,20)= 3.7, p = 0.002
PT vs. HG, t(1,20)= 3.2, p = 0.005
Right Hemisphere
MTG vs. IFG, t(1,20)= 2.2, p = 0.050
MTG vs. AG, t(1,20) = 1.5, p = 0.182
AG vs. IFG, t(1,20) = 1.2, p = 0.265
IFG vs. STG, t(1,20)= 3.7, p = 0.002
AG vs. STG, t(1,20)= 6.0, p < 0.001
STG vs. PT, t(1,20)= 7.0, p < 0.001
STG vs. HG, t(1,20)= 6.6, p < 0.001
PT vs. HG, t(1,20) <1, p = 0.668
Left vs Right regions
IFG, t(1,20)= 3.9, p = 0.004
MTG, t(1,20)= -2.1, p = 0.067
STG, t(1,20)= 2.5, p = 0.044
AG, t(1,20)= -4.6, p < 0.001
PT, t(1,20) = 1.3, p = 0.252
HG, t(1,20) <1, p = 0.461

Transverse and parallel diffusivities were considered as the dependent variables in the ANCOVA models, with age, tract/region, hemisphere (left/right) entered as independent variables (1 covariate and 2 within-subject factors for the models of bilateral tracts and perisylvian regions). An additional ANCOVA is presented for combined left and right tracts (i.e. averaged transverse diffusivity over left and right acoustic radiations AR and arcuate fascicles AF) to include auditory fibers of the corpus callosum ACC without the hemisphere factor.

We further selected post hoc analyses and performed comparisons between selected pairs of tracts/regions using paired t-tests: within each hemisphere (c = 3 for tracts, c = 15 for regions), and across hemispheres for homologous tracts/regions (c = 2 for tracts, c = 6 for regions). Abbreviations used for the tracts/regions names are identical to those of Fig. 3. P-values were corrected using FDR approach for the number of comparisons within each hemisphere condition. For the sake of simplicity, we present only the pairs of regions with the least significant results (all the other comparisons show more significance and can be derived from these pairs). Significant (p < 0.05) comparisons after FDR correction are marked in bold, while those significant comparisons before correction that did not reach the significance threshold of p < 0.05 after correction, are highlighted in italic bold. For the comparisons within each hemisphere, the pairs of tracts/regions were ordered to highlight the gradient of λ / λ// values (from higher to lower ones).