Table 3.
Competing mutant # 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
E+102CpG | E+32CpG | Permuted | Wild-type | ||
Competing mutant #1a | E/NS1+ 176CpG | –b – – |
– – – |
– – – |
– – – |
E+102CpG | – – – |
– – – |
– – – |
||
E+32CpG | – ≈ ≈ |
– ≈ ≈ |
|||
Permuted | ≈ ≈ + |
Relative fitness of the competing mutant #1 over the competing mutant #2 was evaluated in triplicate based on the digestion pattern (Supplementary Figure 1).
“–”: no competing mutant #1 after passaging; “+”: no competing mutant #2 after passaging; “≈”: both mutants present after passaging.