Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 17;9(1):55–62. doi: 10.1530/EC-19-0502

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate influence of thyroid status on the primary endpointa split by baseline eGFR category.

eGFR <45, n = 656 eGFR 45–60, n = 1933 eGFR >60, n = 2275
Subcl hyperth vs euth (n = 14 vs 615) Subcl hypo vs euth (n = 27 vs 615) Subcl hyperth vs euth (n = 35 vs 1830) Subcl hypo vs euth (n = 68 vs 1830) Subcl hyperth vs euth (n = 60 vs 2128) Subcl hypo vs euth (n = 87 vs 2128)
No. of events (%) 6 (33.3) vs 123 (18.8) 8 (20.5) vs 123 (18.8) 4 (12.9) vs 280 (15.0) 8 (7.8) vs 280 (15.0) 4 (9.8) vs 338 (16.0) 16 (13.0) vs 338 (16.0)
Univariate HR (95% CI) 0.72 (0.18–2.93) 1.13 (0.50–2.56) 0.37 (0.09–1.47) 0.28 (0.09–0.88)b 0.55 (0.23–1.33) 1.10 (0.64–1.87)
Age and sex adjusted HR (95% CI) 0.79 (0.20–3.12) 1.18 (0.52–2.69) 0.36 (0.09–1.43) 0.27 (0.09–0.86)b 0.54 (0.22–1.31) 1.10 (0.65–1.89)
Multivariate adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.07 (0.26–4.40) 1.41 (0.57–3.51) 0.25 (0.03–1.76) 0.24 (0.06–0.95)b 0.54 (0.20–1.45) 1.43 (0.83–2.46)

Multivariate adjusted analysis include prespecified variables: country, age, gender, use of pravastatin, history of vascular disease, history of diabetes mellitus, history of hypertension, current smoking, alcohol in units/week, BMI, total cholesterol/HDL-ratio, albumin.

aPrimary endpoint includes coronary heart disease death or non-fatal myocardial infarction or fatal or non-fatal stroke; bP-value of hazard ratio <0.05.

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.