TABLE 3.
Association (Adjusted Binary Logistic Regressions) of W4 to W7 RWI With W1 to W3 Binge Drinking and Parenting Variables Among Emerging Adults
| W4 (N = 2149) | W5 (N = 2143) | W6 (N = 2257) | W7 (N = 2293) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| aOR | 95% CI | P | aOR | 95% CI | P | aOR | 95% CI | P | aOR | 95% CI | P | |
| Binge drinking in W3, yes versus no | 4.2 | 2.8 to 6.4 | <.001 | 3.1 | 2.1 to 4.6 | <.001 | 3.6 | 2.2 to 5.9 | <.001 | 2.6 | 1.4 to 4.8 | <.01 |
| Binge drinking | ||||||||||||
| 3 times versus none | 8.2 | 4.3 to 15.6 | <.0001 | 4.2 | 2.3 to 7.7 | <.0001 | 5.5 | 2.7 to 11.4 | <.0001 | 3.2 | 1.5 to 7.0 | .0052 |
| Twice versus none | 3.8 | 2.5 to 5.8 | <.0001 | 3.2 | 1.8 to 5.9 | .0005 | 1.8 | 1.1 to 2.8 | .0146 | 2.4 | 1.2 to 4.7 | .0148 |
| Once versus none | 2.7 | 1.4 to 5.3 | .005 | 2.5 | 1.6 to 3.7 | .0002 | 1.5 | 1.0 to 2.4 | .0678 | 1.3 | 0.9 to 1.9 | .1119 |
| W1 to W3 father monitoring knowledge (grand mean) | 0.8 | 0.7 to 0.9 | <.01 | 0.9 | 0.8 to 1.2 | >.05 | 0.9 | 0.7 to 1.1 | >.05 | 0.8 | 0.7 to 1.0 | <.05 |
| W1 to W3 mother monitoring knowledge (grand mean) | 0.8 | 0.6 to 1.1 | >.05 | 0.9 | 0.6 to 1.3 | >.05 | 0.7 | 0.4 to 1.2 | >.05 | 0.9 | 0.5 to 1.6 | >.05 |
| W1 to W3 parental support of not using alcohol (grand mean) | 0.8 | 0.7 to 1.0 | <.05 | 1.0 | 0.8 to 1.1 | >.05 | 0.9 | 0.8 to 1.0 | >.05 | 0.9 | 0.7 to 1.1 | >.05 |
Less than or greater than P values are reported when there are no pairwise comparisons, and exact P values are reported when there are pairwise comparisons. Controlling for race and/or ethnicity, parent highest education, family affluence, urbanicity, current residence, and sex. W1 to W3: 10th grade to 12th grade; W4 to W7: 1 to 4 y after high school. N was the total number of participants who had valid RWI values in the corresponding wave. aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.