TABLE 6.
Association (Adjusted Linear Regression) of W4 to W7 C-RDS With W1 to W3 Binge Drinking and Parenting Variables
| W4 (N = 1253)b | W5 (N = 1429)b | W6 (N = 1595)b | W7 (N = 1751)b | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | 95% CI | P | β | 95% CI | P | β | 95% CI | P | β | 95% CI | P | |
| Binge drinking in W3, yes versus no | 1.9 | 0.9 to 2.9 | <.001 | 2.1 | .7 to 3.6 | <.01 | 1.6 | 0.2 to 3.1 | <.05 | 1.9 | 0.2 to 3.6 | <.05 |
| Binge drinking | ||||||||||||
| 3 times versus none | 3.3 | 1.4 to 5.3 | <.01 | 3.3 | .5 to 6.0 | <.05 | 2.0 | −1.1 to 5.0 | >.05 | 2.6 | 0.3 to 5.0 | <.05 |
| Twice versus none | 2.6 | 1.5 to 3.8 | <.001 | 1.1 | −.3 to 2.6 | >.05 | 1.1 | −0.8 to 2.9 | >.05 | 1.3 | −0.1 to 2.7 | >.05 |
| Once versus none | .4 | −0.8 to 4.6 | >.05 | .9 | −.4 to 2.2 | >.05 | 1.1 | −0.1 to 2.4 | >.05 | .3 | −0.7 to 1.3 | >.05 |
| W1 to W3 father monitoring knowledge (grand mean) | −.1 | −0.6 to 0.5 | >.05 | .1 | −.7 to 0.9 | >.05 | .1 | −0.5 to 0.8 | >.05 | .3 | −0.5 to 1.0 | >.05 |
| W1 to W3 mother monitoring knowledge (grand mean) | −1.5 | −2.5 to −0.4 | <.01 | −1.0 | −2.4 to 0.4 | >.05 | .4 | −1.1 to 1.9 | >.05 | −.5 | −1.7 to 0.6 | >.05 |
| W1 to W3 parental support of not using alcohol (grand mean) | −.5 | −1.1 to 0.1 | >.05 | .1 | −.7 to 0.9 | >.05 | .0 | −0.6 to 0.6 | >.05 | −.4 | −0.9 to 0.2 | >.05 |
Less than or greater than P values are reported when there are no pairwise comparisons, and exact P values are reported when there are pairwise comparisons. Controlling for race and/or ethnicity, parent highest education, family affluence, urbanicity, current residence, and sex. W1 to W3: 10th grade to 12th grade; W4 to W7: 1 to 4 y after high school. N was the total number of participants who had valid values for C-RDS and an independent driving license in the corresponding wave. CI, confidence interval.