Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 24;9:1478. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01478

Table 4.

Comparison of the net benefits in clinical decisions regarding the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients with AFP < 400 μg/L.

Pt (%) Net benefit Advantage of the model
Intervention to all patients Intervention based on the model Increment of net benefit Unnecessary intervention avoided per 100 patients
3 0.278 0.278 0.000 0
5 0.263 0.268 0.005 10
8 0.239 0.253 0.014 16
10 0.222 0.241 0.019 17
20 0.125 0.206 0.081 32
30 0.000 0.178 0.178 42
40 −0.167 0.163 0.330 50
50 −0.400 0.135 0.535 54
60 −0.750 0.111 0.861 57
70 −1.333 0.096 1.429 61
80 −2.500 0.060 2.560 64
90 −6.000 0.033 6.033 67
96 −16.50 0.019 16.519 69

Pt, threshold probability; “Increment of net benefit” is calculated as: net benefit of the model – net benefit of intervention to all; “Unnecessary intervention avoided per 100 patients” is calculated as Vickers and Elkin (17): (net benefit of the model – net benefit of intervention to all)/(pt/(1– pt)) × 100.