Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 29;10(42):9692–9698. doi: 10.1039/c9sc02711d

Table 2. Comparison of rates and % PROS values of different porphyrins.

Catalysts Effect Rate (Kcat) (M–1 S–1) PROS (%) C16SH SAM Ref.
PPSR-yne (Fig. 8A) Only ‘push’ from the axial site 1.11 × 107 22 15
FeCu–phenol (Fig. 8B) Redox species in the 2nd sphere 1.2 × 105 11 11
FeFc4 (Fig. 8C) Redox species + H-bond (2nd sphere) 5 × 104 10 35
Fc3(CH3Ph)–PorCo (Fig. 8D) Electron donor groups in the 2nd sphere 100 (EEPG) 33
FeL2 (Fig. 8E) H-bond + protonated basic grp. (2nd sphere) 1.80 × 107 5 26
FeIIICl–MARG (Fig. 2) H-bond + protonated basic grp. (2nd sphere) 4.2 × 106 18
Fe–MARG–N-MeImd (Fig. 8F) H-bond + protonated basic grp. (2nd sphere) + push effect 1.76 × 106 7